They might focus on dental problems and aesthetic techniques, however the only cause we went there's simply because they were allegedly a Metlife Preferred Dental Supplier. From the conditions of this agreement, they ought to have just billed people what Metlife claims they're permitted to cost underneath the PDP charge. They're declining to come back the 281.60 they owe my child. They charged her $350 to remove a tooth so when Metlife stated these were just allowed to cost 68.40, they did not recognize that agreement together. Whenever we attempted to go over this using the dentist, he got belligerent and rude - including shouting at me.
Today we're having to document a with Metlife and possibly prosecute this supplier simply to encourage them to return the cash that's mine. Simply because they had $350 of my childis profit their selfish fingers, she was not able to spend her lease the week that she'd the tooth removed and was eventually evicted from her house.
0 comments