I bought a 2MB MP4 Player, a model of 2007 for $91, - including an inflated shipping cost. The ball player was marketed as new. The interface to move information and also to cost the unit was free and didn't run whatsoever. The integrated adapter wasn't authorized to become offered in america.
I delivered the faulty item for their supplier and required a return. I advised uBid of the noncompliant adapter by notice.
An associate at work of the supplier educated me that she was directed by uBid to refuse a credit/replacement and also to substitute the faulty product. She established that another fresh 2GB MP4 Person was present in their inventory which it had been delivered.
I received an upgraded, the container came covered having a recording. The 'new' container included another adapter. The 2nd participantis information outlet can also be free, whilst the one before, but operable. The merchandise doesn't have title determining the maker and it has neither a sequential number or an examination identification. I looked over the changed system and unearthed that the screws display minor markings of adjustment. I thought this participant was exposed to correct the outlet.
I compared the alternative with pictures I'd obtained of the initial, it established they were similar. Because two additional capabilities had ceased functioning I believed that perhaps the attempted fix had more broken the ball player. Therefore, I wrote another notice.
I considered getting the battery after I realized that the 2nd adapter thought just like a useless doll. I examined the signal and discovered it'd an illegitimate UL label instead.
I paid to get a fresh MP4 player, obtained faulty gray market crap by having an illegitimate adapter. Then it had been changed using the same participant, nevertheless faulty having a diverse adapter that's also noncompliant.
I am just speachless.
0 comments