VersusLaw website is a Cyber Bullying website that intentionally seeks out defamatory information posted in cases by the parties for a fee.
VersusLaw
- for a price, wants be the voice and the source on the internet for unethical attorneys and other legal sources essentially the Cyber Bullies
Versuslaw uses snippets of pleadings for judicial abuse and unethical conduct, paid for by destructive attorneys who dont know how to play fair.
Versuslaw subscription only website paid by attorneys or other legal parties to post abusive public information with the intentional to hurt and harm that party of a case a diabolical effort to allow the attorneys to be viewed as clean from unethical conduct or judicial misconduct.
Our investigation and research show that Attorneys post pleading that are argumentative, defaming, besmirching, slanderous. These pleading supplied to the courts in attempts to influence the opinions of the judges. Even though the
objections and response are opposed and entered to the court, (and maybe seen by the Judge) by opposing Counsel, the damage is done, especially in a public case.
The counter claims are not what this Cyber Bully wants or intend to show to the internet, therefore plying a dangerous game.
CyberBulling by paid subscription - thru a third party.
Versuslaw either already has that client as a subscriber or seeks out that attorney.in our investigation, Versuslaw tells us as the attorney (or legal person), that theVersusLaw website can make this a first look, when that person name is searched on the internet, a clear unethical misconduct by any attorney. Clearly misconduct by VersusLaw and the Attorney and should be held accountable for slander, jury tampering and case conspiracy to defraud the public and possible jurors with such unverified or false knowledge.
It is despicable that any attorneys (defense or not), are subscriber of any fee based or paid for services of such as Versuslaw who boasts a long list of companies who post information to them for this intention. Versuslaw Knowingly is abusing the judicial system therefore conducting themselves unprofessionally and with unethical conduct by using passages of pleading, with full intent to hurt and defame the person and case.
Passages posted to the internet that are unverified making critical accusations to the courts for people to read that are going to be in jury trials. VersusLaw contacts attorneys to post these snippets of slander, to get the subscription of those attorneys a paid service for that attorney. The clear intention of this site is not inform the public of cases, but to intentionally hurt and besmirch the opposing person or company.intentionally defaming the persons business or
personal lives and potentially the outcome of the case, by influencing the jury with false information and no way to refute it.
Attorneys on both sides often post false, accusatory, inflammatory and incorrect information based on omission, error onus information, opinions from only the attorneys.
These claims and statements made in a form of pleadings to the judge, that become public information with the desired effect to hurt and discredit the plaintiff. That should not be allowed this is a clear reason of why.
Versus Law is the worst of the worst and should be shut down. Shut down based on it evident intention s to take the cases, under the pretense of subscription services where they post these false, defamatory statements and unverified snippets of information to the web in a context that smears the other party to intentional defame and slander with opinions and false allegations made to the judge.
This is abuse of the justice system and posting of public information to intentionally cause harm or cyber bullying
0 comments