Now my personal dealings with this company has turned up some very interesting results.
Now Select Portfolio filed a fraudulent mortgage Foreclosure against my property, in the state of Pennsylvania. Using lawyers from Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott in Philly and Pittsburgh, who failed to comply every state Law, additionally they admitted to contract fraud.
Which time I then filed charges against them in the Third Circuit Federal Court, with the main charges being. 1. Filing a Fraudulent Mortgage Foreclosure 2. Contract Fraud 3. Unlawful Enrichment
None of which where denied in Federal Court. Now here is where it gets interesting, because the Third Circuit Federal Court has in fact used unlawful acts to protect Select Portfolio Servicing.
Now first the Third Circuit permitted Select Portfolio's lawyers to file documents late, along with filing documents for a party they where not representing (Credit Suisse).
Then they handled each charge as follows, First the District Court Judge (DAVIS) claimed the Rooker - Feldman doctrine on the first count by claiming a single word "BARRED", which was contained in a request against Select Portfolio. Now the Third Circuit Appeal Court agreed that the Rooker - Feldman did not apply to my case. But then the Appeal Court without any legal support divided the first count in to two parts "Title and Content", and claimed the content was barred by the Rooker - Feldman. Now the Second Circuit Federal Appeal Court ruled this action to be Deceptive.
Then the Third Circuit District Court Judge (Davis) altered the title of the Second Count "Contract Fraud: to a violation of the Truth in Lending Act to claim the statute of limitations. Now the Truth in Lending Act and HornBook Law where both used as reference laws, to explain the contract fraud.
Which the Third Circuit Appeal Court continued this act. (the Department of Justice has stated this is unlawful)
Then in regards to the third count " Unlawful Enrichment" the District Court Judge alter the title of this count to "Unjust Enrichment", and then claimed it was not a legal charge. Now the contents of this charge consisted of fraud committed by Select Portfolio, such as shown on the loan history they altered the payment due date in their accounts receivable computer. To claim Unlawful Lated fees and other fees. (so look at your loan history and compare it to your monthly statements)
Which time the District Judge disregarded this fraud. Which the Third Circuit Appeal Court continued this action.
Now a Petition for Rehearing by an En Banc Court was filed, and in accordance with court rules ONLY the chief Judge can sign an En Banc Court Order. However, my Petition was intercepted by one of the Appeal Court Judges (Chagares) who then drafted a En Banc Court order. Making it appear like it was handled by an En Banc Court. But he signed the Order himself, which is not permitted since first he is only a circuit court judge (Lowest Judge on the pole).
(Lesson: don't always trust the courts)
Now presently the case is in front of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the subject of the Petition of Writ is based on the Corruption in the Third Circuit Court.
Additionally documents have been filed with the Department of Justice Public Integrity Division, along with reports being filed with other offices.
Now lets see how fare up the ladder this corruption goes?
Now I've appeared in front of 12 Judges in my life and only 2 Judges are still on the bench.
0 comments