Bought a 1971 Martin N-28S guitar In The Shop Knoxville. Just before my purchase I particularly requested when the guitar was who is fit and requested to reveal any conditions that your guitar had. I had been informed by Josh Sidman who owns the company, the guitar was in "exceptional situation and had no problems." After buying the guitar for $2300 plus $70 delivery and getting it within the email roughly per week later I observed there is a break within the the top of guitar. I quickly approached Josh and informed him of my problem. Josh accepted that after he was supplying your guitar he also observed the break. But he never advised me of his results. Josh agreed to provide me $300 off that we approved. I got your guitar to my luthier within Albuquerque so that as quickly when I confirmed him your guitar he instantly noticed that the link have been shaven. This really is completed to prevent the cost of getting a throat reset and it is not really a positive thing to complete since it also results the audio of your guitar. I quickly approached Josh and informed him of my findings. At which period he explained he'd previously settled who owns your guitar since the guitar was on consignment but after some marketing and voicing my issues for that incorrect information and also the proven fact that Mr Sidman is available of promoting instruments he must have recognized the problems Mr Sidman chose to return my income. Nevertheless he declined to return the delivery costs that we sustained which came to $70-plus the return delivery of $56.35 to get a whole of $126.35. I'm requesting reinbursement of these delivery costs that we shouldn't need to spend because of the shady explanation of your guitar I bought.
0 comments