Laurie Debauw was hired by my family to keep me under surveillance. My family also contacted the Clark County Sheriff's Office to let them know what they were going to do and for the Sheriff's Office not to help me.
My phone was tapped and my emails hacked. I recently noticed a facebook page I started had the writing erased and an online petition was deleted, so I strongly suspect this situation continues.
By having me followed, my family found out which vets I was taking my dog to and paid them to have him killed. My dog was poisoned by the vets.
On November 19th, a woman tried to gain access to my house pretending to be a flower delivery person. I didn't open the door. The woman then trespassed into my backyard and tried to break into my house through the back door. I called 911 and took pictures of the woman's minivan.By the time the deputies arrived the woman was gone. I told what happened to the deputies and added that it seemed there were more people inside the minivan. Dep. Paulson said it was serious and he ran the license plate. Then he came back and told e because the vehicle wasn't stolen they wouldn't investigate and the woman was trying to serve me papers.
Those were lies. What happened is that he realized the vehicle belonged to Girl Friday. He should have let me known my family had me under surveillance. My dog would be alive today.
Dep. Paulson wouldn't let me file a police rpeort, and every time I went to the sheriff's office to file a police report, they wouldn't let me. Finally I filed a police report via email. They dismissed it.
The Clark County Sheriff's Office dismissed an attempted break in report.
I filed a restraining order against Laurie Debauw. I brought the evidence I have. She brought a letter from her lawyer saying she had been hired by my family and the sheriff's office knew it. The judge refused to let me talk or to see my evidence and didn't grant me the restraining order, even though there was an attempted break into my house and my dog was brutally murdered. I suspect Laurie Debauw is suing me now, which means my family is suing me through her.
The dates she claims she was hired by my family are important because my mother reported me a missing person claiming I went missing in Seattle on August 08th. I've been to Seattle only once, in 1993. Here's the link:
Www.desapareceu.org/extranet/pessoas-desaparecidas-19483.html
Then, on May 14th, my mother started a motion to have me legally declared an absent person (legally dead) claiming she doesn't know where I am. Had she succeeded, she would have kept an inheritance that belongs to me. She already stole several million dollars from that inheritance, and there's some money left.
For anybody who is reading this report, knows my family and believed them when they said they didn't know where I was: It's not true. They know exactly where I am, what I do, who I talk to in the phone, my emails, which sites I visit, which vets I take my dogs, etc. Always have.
Laurie Debauw's lawyer wrote she was hired in November. I dispute that date because of some other previous incidents that took place.
Aren't there any laws preventing private detectives form aiding stalkers and/or criminals in harming their victims? Had my family not know where I was taking my dog, he would still be alive.
It cost me $10,000 trying to keep my dog alive.
Private detectives shouldn't provide information to stalkers and/or criminals regarding their targeted victims. It is very troublesome that the Clark County Sheriff's Office decided not to warn me about what was going on and prevented me from filing police reports, even when they knew my mother had reported me a missing person and my dog was being murdered by the vets. That is police misconduct and that is the subject of another complaint.By knowing which vets I was taking my dog to, my family was able to paid them to torture him to death.
Detectives shouldn't help people in the commission of crimes, and definitely never help anybody to murder a dog. Laurie Debauw does.
I miss my dog very much.
0 comments