NRG Assets, Inc.involved Greenwald & Hoffman LLP of Santa Ana, CA regarding the numerous legitimate conflicts including case against many former professionals and experts, who additionally counter-charged our organization. John E. Greenwald and Paul A. Hoffman advised us to change from Sheppard Mullin, a sizable lawyer that were addressing us within this along with other litigation issues as well as Greenberg & Traurig.
Many weeks before test, a created between us and Paul E. Greenwald and Paul A. Hoffman concerning the quantity of their expenses, which we thought were extreme. It had been an extremely demanding period for the organization. Certainly, despite the fact that we'd compensated Greenwald & Hoffman large six-figures in costs, they confronted to withdraw in the case-only a couple weeks before test if we didn't spend them entirely their newest statement. They adopted through about the risk, and left people just a few months before test.in so doing Paul Greenwald and Paul Hoffman set our organization and people within an exceptionally challenging and unsure placement, and we'd to struggle to locate a lawyer about the event of test to save lots of our situation. To include insult to damage, Greenwald and Hoffman subsequently charged us for costs they claimed we still owed, but waited until following the law of restrictions for qualified negligence ended possibly to be able to steer clear of the chance of getting charged by us.
Though some facets of the support Greenwald & Hoffman supplied were sufficient, we genuinely believe that Greenwald & Hoffman ended up to become more costly compared to large companies we'd depended on previously. The underside line is the fact that the worthiness to gain percentage didn't work with people with Greenwald & Hoffman.
Overall we didn't possess a great encounter with Paul E. Greenwald and Paul A. Hoffman of Greenwald & Hoffman. We weren't happy with the worthiness or outcomes, and we'd not advise them.
0 comments