San Bernardino District Attorney Commits Deliberate Fraud & Congestion of Justice
On January 25, Deputy District Attorney Jonathan Robbins was requested release a breakthrough he'd within its ownership for four weeks with that the District Attorney depended to create the foundation of Rely 5 of Criminal Misdemeanor Complaint No. Msb906348, (i.E., California Penal Code section 166 (a) (4), "Disobeying a Court-Order" which based on court public records I dedicated on October 8.
The "Court-Order" I apparently disobeyed was a temporary restraining order introduced by Keith and Patty White, released by Judge Gilbert Ochoa on October 6, and offered on me by Sergeant Jeremy King on October 9 after I was in prison and have been since July 8, on costs regarding the this same situation.
However, Rely 5 of MSB906348 states that I disobeyed a court-order on October 8 that will be logistically difficult as you can't break a court-order that'snot been offered in it nevertheless, and especially if they're in prison.
Once The District Attorney (specifically, Laura Robles) recognized I'd captured onto this deliberate scam and congestion of justice, she changed the breach day for Count 5 about the published Legal Problem to March 17 to correspond using the start of the Brightis grievances against me to make sure a lasting purchase.
However, it had been too late to create this change about the courtroom report / docket, without calling focus on the scam. The breach time about the courtroom report / docket happens to be and it is even today, October 8.
Then Your District Attorney did anything truly amazing. To deflect my focus from the fraudulently modified breach day on Count 5, additionally they changed the breach times for Matters 2,3, and 4-to March 17 about the published Criticism, wishing I'dnot recognize. Count 2 was "resisting arrest" and Matters 3 and 4 were "battery on the peace officer." (More on that later.)
If, actually, I had been imprisoned on October 8-9 for apparently resisting arrest even though in custody struggling two cops, why might the District Attorney condition about the established Criticism "under fee of perjury" these offenses happened on October 17?
Additionally, Laura Robles delayed the processing of the Criticism before District Attorney and also the Whites might change a permanent restraining order injunction against me in municipal court to assist their situation in criminal court.
It Is no chance the day of the lasting, 3-year restraining order against me authorized by Judge Steven C. Malone was dated about the identical day whilst the Legal Criticism in this instance: October 28.
Consequently, Laura Robles was treated in the situation and Deputy District Attorney William Gale was designated. The very first time I had been permitted to see the Criticism and also the 71 pages of data gathered to "verify" the legal charges against me, was on December 9 in the Pretrial Hearing.
Unbeknownst to me, Deputy DA Gale was hiding around within the hall on December 9, while Iam researching the Criticism and proof for that very first time, keeping a Plea-Bargain he anxiously hopes I'll signal therefore the scam and congestion of justice wont emerged.
I outright refused the Plea-Bargain since it requested me to acknowledge to offenses I'd not determined. Additionally, it stated I'd to accept visit prison and function probation for offenses I'd not determined. Subsequently, it explained I'd to "stop blogging, " amounting to some waiver of my First Amendment to free speech.
In January Bill Gale was treated in the situation and Jonathan Robbins was designated. I am unclear about the District Attorney's strategic direction. They began this situation with Laura Robles who handed the club in 1988 (22 years experience) to Bill Gale who handed the club in 1999 (11 years experience) and today they place in Jonathan Robbins who handed the club in November (24 months experience). Are they operating out-of DAs?
On January 25, within an try to offset the above mentioned-mentioned deliberate fraud from the court and legal obstruction of justice, Robbins, in open Courtroom, required the Courtroom modify the published Criticism regarding the breach times of Matters 2,3 and 4 which Laura Robles had sworn under fee of perjury were dedicated on October 17.
Robbins required the Courtroom modify the breach times of Matters 2,3 and 4-to March 8, as though there have been some "typographical mistake" that no body had captured for that previous 3 months. The court report / docket has constantly preserved the day of March 8, and altering the day on the bit of document (the published Criticism) can't offset the legal span of conduct perpetrated from the District Attorney.
Robbins was required to try to "repair the problem" so the District Attorney might atleast possess a chance at possible cause the offenses may have occurred. Utilizing the day that Laura Robles wrongly changed (Oct 17) offered the District Attorney no chance at it whatsoever.
Obviously, Robbins simply made herself in further when he didn't contain Depend 5 in his demand to modify. That day remained in the fraudulently modified day of July 17. Nevertheless, one just need consider the Courtroom report/docket to determine the reality.
While Robbins required the modification towards the Criticism, he understood that:
(1) the District Attorney experienced fraudulently and maliciously altered the breach dates;
(2) there is no report of any legal action on October 17 regarding Matters 2,3, and 4;
(3) there is no possible cause to cost me with these offenses on any date;
(4) no guarantee endured for my charge for almost any of the offenses on any date;
(5) the breach date of Rely 5 of the Criticism must have been modified to March 8, to reveal the real and proper processing of stated cost; and
(6) the whole motion of Legal Criticism MSB906348 was based on an egregiously damaged individual vendetta of the Whites whereby they used individual associations inside the Big Bear Sheriff's Division to wrongly arrest, imprison, brutalize, after which warrant legal charges against me that didn't occur.
All The above comprises an intentional fraud from the courtroom and legal obstruction of justice. The District Attorney should be held responsible and all costs against me should be ignored instantly. Additionally, I'm calling for that instant suspension in the exercise of regulation of Jonathan Robbins, William Gale, Laura Robles and Michael Ramos, pending a reading from the Main Trial Lawyer of the California State Bar.
Side note:
Atleast 90% of the "proof" given the Legal Criticism was attached to Keith and Patty White's statements against me for municipal nuisance, the restraining orders, and my website, "The Large Bearian."
Finally, I realize why the Whites were at-all my legal case proceedings. I also discovered about the Bright-Big Bear Sheriff link which created my fake charge and incarceration feasible.
Contained in The proof was an interview performed by Deputy Michael McCracken where he says for that report that Keith White is just a private buddy of Big Bear Sheriff Sergeant Jeremy King in addition to additional Large Bear Sheriff employees.
McCracken-On September 23: "Keith stated he's buddies with Deputy Master and had voiced with Deputy Master in an individual environment about 'that which was happening with Baldwin.' Keith said Deputy Master informed him he could easily get a restraining order against Baldwin."
MISSION STATEMENT: Work of the Distict Attorney - Region of San Bernardino, State-Of California:
The San Bernardino County District Attorney's Workplace presents the passions of the folks within the legal justice program, as required by Florida state-law. The San Bernardino County District Attorney's Workplace acts the citizens of San Bernardino Region by: (1) Seeking the reality; (2) Guarding the harmless; (3) Keeping the responsible responsible; (4) Protecting the pride of patients as well as their households; and (5) making certain justice is performed while usually sustaining the greatest of moral requirements.
To find out more: http://thebigbearianreturns. Wordpress.com
0 comments