Mr STEVE Maleys affidavits (SUN MANAGER) on (may/17 and This sworn affidavit shows by clear and convincing
evidence that Mr Maley be half of the Defendant SUNOCO inc (r&m) acted with fraud, oppression, or malice. {S 210-15}
Because of this act, Defendant must have known that the representation was false when made.
{After those affidavit I understand Mr Maley must have made the representation with an intent to defraud me.
{Fraud would perhaps have made the contract and the Breach valid at this option.}
{I have been unaware of the falsity of the representation;} until I read his affidavit.
I believe in this case be half of the Mr Maley Sun REP
Sunoco inc (r&m) liable for all the damages. $ 68.000.00 dameges & 26%
interest, from-July/16 2002 (STAY IN Sunoco's ACCAUNT RIGHT NOW)
Finally Defendant Attorneys responsibilities about Mr Maleys Affidavit are false.
June/6) are actual fraud or intentionally misconduct.
Kanat Arbay (pro se) V. Sunoco inc r m Thirth District Court Great Neck Part
Case No: 00870-05
0 comments