Usacomplaints.com » Politics & Government » Complaint / Review: Bank Levy Dispute - Negligent of justice. #228098

Complaint / Review
Bank Levy Dispute
Negligent of justice

This publishing would be to document a proper problem to Evaluate Alexander G. Waugh, Jr. The Judge of the Superior Court in Middlesex County, NJ.

This situation is regarding a car name challenge to get a 96 Honda Odyssey trade in vehicle between me (the offender, who owns the 96 Honda Odyssey) and McCafferty Ford Sales Inc at Bucks County, PA (the plaintiff). The situation was submitted towards the Superior Court of PA at Bucks County in September of and was closed-in 2004. The situation was again submitted from the plaintiff towards the Superior Court of NJ in Middlesex County in 2005. Judge Alexander G. Waugh, Jr. Was designated to deal with this situation. Through the procedure in managing this situation, Judge Alexander G. Waugh has shown neglect and unfairness on the basis of the details given below.

1. Once the situation was submitted within the Superior Court of NJ from the plaintiff, the plaintiff didn't deliver a duplicate of the processing towards the offender needed from the judge rule. The delivery quantity for that email they're designed to deliver towards the offender is needed to be on paper in one single type of the plaintiff’s processing. But, Judge Waugh never lifted a problem towards the plaintiff respect this issue actually he did realize that this can charge the offender to get rid of important time to reaction.

2. Judge Waugh requested the view in support of the plaintiff overlooking the truth that the offender didn't actually understand there is this type of case against him.

3. I submitted a movement to refuse Judge Waugh’s purchase after I ultimately obtained a duplicate of his purchase in the plaintiff. Due to the details outlined in my own movement, Judge Waugh created an order to come back the case-back towards the Superior Court of PA.

4.in answering Decide Waugh’s this purchase, I instantly submitted a towards the Superior Court of PA at Bucks County as well as delivered a duplicate towards the plaintiff. But in the mean time, the plaintiff submitted another movement towards the Superior Court of NJ overlooking this situation was moving in the Superior Court of PA in the time. The plaintiff again didn't follow the judge principle to deliver me a duplicate due to their processing. But Judge Waugh’s created an order in support of the plaintiff simply by overlooking the situation continues to be declined towards the Superior Court of PA by herself.

5. I submitted another movement to refuse Judge Waugh’s purchase after I ultimately obtained a duplicate of the purchase again just in the plaintiff. Within this movement, I connected all of the files I submitted towards the Superior Court of PA, undoubtedly such as the situation quantity released from the Superior Court of PA.

6. But, Judge Waugh refused my movement having a basic clarification that I didn't show that I've submitted the situation in PA Superior Court. It's undoubtedly unjust along with a complete neglect to create this kind of order given that I've connected all my processing files towards the PA Superior Court such as the situation quantity released from the Superior Court of PA.

7. Actually that Judge Waugh doesn't consider the situation number released from the Superior Court of PA like a legally legitimate quantity; he must atleast demand me to supply further files to show it. He shouldn't create a view centered on individual presumption as opposed to the reality.

8. I'm today result in a scenario that for that same issue, I've one situation still awaiting view within the Superior Court of PA plus one situation was requested by Judge Waugh within the Superior Court of NJ in support of the plaintiff. I will barely imagine how must I reaction an order in the Superior Court of PA that'll come sometime.

Due To Judge Waugh’s neglect in managing this situation, I didn't get the equity and justice that I'm assistance to get from the US constitution. I had been also significantly broken economically like a customer against among the biggest car store in Pennsylvania. The worst is the fact that I'm today in an exceedingly uncomfortable scenario questioning just how to reaction to the arriving purchase in the Superior Court of PA.


Offender: Bank Levy Dispute

Country: USA

Category: Politics & Government

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google