Attorney, Cheryl Erber 1900 Birch Street Palo Alto, CA Re: Refund of our Retainer Payment of $2000. To You and Your Non-Performance on your Retainer Agreement for legal services for Michael and Stacy. Dear Ms. Erber: Following our previous Demand for return of our Payment of $2000. Due to your Non-Performance, you then wrote us back saying, essentially, that you were going to reconcile your billing to see if any monies were due back to us. We would like to advise you that if you did perform any work in our behalf, we would be willing to pay for it, for example:
1. Did you File an Attorney Substitution with the Court? We think not.
2. Did you File and Serve our Amended Complaint? We think not.
3. Did you File and Serve our Ex-Parte Injunction / TRO? We think not.
4. Did you plan to represent us in Court? Well, we know the answer to this question as you already wrote us saying that you probably could not make it, but that you would "Attempt to be there" but we were not to forget that "You [we] are still In Pro Per.
0 comments