I have been dealing with The Superior Court of Arizona since August. My x & I settled out of court with a settlement agreement which was accepted by a Superior court Judge Rayes, a civil matter, which according to ARS 25-317 G the court can not change or even get involved, the respondent agreed to pay $36,000.00 into the petitioners bank account, which proof was provided, The State Attorney's office involved themselves with A settlement agreement moving words around to put the matter under child support, ilegally according to Civil Law, The State Attorney's Office assisted the petitioner in these false claims of "Alimony Arrears". The Superior Court of Arizona Judge Buttrick made the agreement Void which contained matters concerning Custody, child support, and Alimony, because my x - wife committed fraud upon the court. The Judge stated on the record the respondents obligation to pay alimony is terminated as of Sept. 1st 2006. The IV-D Commissioner Steven Kupiszewski, Asst. Attorney's for the State Cynthia Balwin, and Katherine Hoole, have added over $23,000.00 to a new Atlas number which was developed after the court date Of October 16th. The State Attorney's Office has added these totals of so called "Alimony Arrears" which is a Civil matter / Settlement agreement to a child support matter, calling the whole matter child support arrears. The child in question was not attending school, the amancipation was Sept. 8th 2008 and the State Attorney's office continues to add child supportt monthly, including arrears and alimony.
The point is the matter is not under IV-D Court jurisdiction since it was a civil matter, the matter can not be added to child support to enforce the matter under Domestic Relations matters. I live in Ohio and have filed countless motions as can be clearly seen at the Superior Court case information section "Case number DR014500" The matter is also in the Appeals court under 1- AC CV 08-0251 The respondent has a right to file this case to the US Supreme Court because of violations of civil rights according to the 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, 14th amendments and the court violating matters under color of State Law which also allows a federal Tort claim under 1983. Several violations of federal rights and violations under color of state law by State Officials and State Employees, which according to Federal law the violaters are not protected against lawsuit if they are violating matters under color of State Law, these violations / matters are clearly not judicial acts the state officials can be protected by these acts, and are treasonist acts according to The Constitution of the United States of America, and Federal Law. All matters subitted is true and proof can be provided according to Minute entries of the court, and documents submitted as exhibits, Motions made to the court, proof provided, and ignored by the court system of Arizona.
0 comments