Safe Promises Inc. President Douglas Ronald Cottle Deceptive Fund-Raising / Investment Methods.inaccurate Sales Information and Debt Default Standing to Traders and Channel Sales Leads. Illegal Cancellation of Buyer Shareholdings. Observe present Arizona, California, NV, HELLO, OR, WA, and National Inspections including Arizona Corporation Commission and Investor Steps Mesa Arizona
SEVERE HEATING about using the services of the corporation - Revenue. Relationship or Expense. Total comprehensive research and contact traders, employees, preceding employees, and suppliers, and also the Illinois and Oregon Corporation Payment prior to making any published or common contracts using the dictatorship of the business.
Many preliminary and following traders are seeking collection for deceptive fund-raising and misunderstanding and nondisclosure of obligations in addition to inappropriate expense and SEC methods. View Arizona Corporation Commission analysis. View also numerous statements granted to preceding workers and suppliers. View also public record information of bossis previous background with SRI, FutureCom Global, McAffe, LDS Chapel, and household documents regarding municipal claims.
If you were to think you've experienced deceptive and/or deceptive representation out of this organization whether revenue related, expense related, worker related, merchant related, please quickly contact the following:
Phong (John) Huynh phuyn@azcc. Gov 602-542-0908 Atty Investments Department
Man Phillips gphillips@azcc. Gov 602-542-0182 Unique Detective
When you have obtained any files, files, or e-mails, between 2001 to present, please forward towards the above.
=
Attn safe answers traders and investors! New results:
Bradley Gardner, and also the Udall, Shumway & Lyons, P.L.C. [the company] state they represent our expense, Safe Promises, Inc. While simultaneously addressing Douglas Cottle, individually. Gardner and his company have positioned themselves in a significant turmoil of curiosity and responsibility place. We identify equally Gardner and also the company being an method to recover our expense resources and problems. This really is extra proof of Cottleis self-interest and never the Organization and traders.
Cottle has used An Individual Injury lawyer, not really a Company or SEC attorney to represent our expense, and manage the investigative issues using the Arizona Corporation Commission. Gardner, and [the company], have approved the inconsistent obligation of addressing our expense, Safe Promises Inc, in addition to Douglas Cottle, individually - unlike the most obvious turmoil, by trademark towards the Reaction above.
Bio: http://www.udallshumway.com/lawyer-attorney-1158276.html
The conflicting interest perhaps contains Cottle's spouse, COO, and BOD. Your Private Eye (PI) indicates although not yet established that Gardneris company displayed Cottle's spouse in an individual car damage situation. Workers and former workers of the organization state she misrepresented her accidents with remarks and bodily steps at the office. Facts will soon be provided the moment gathered. Personality problems regarding historic integrity and integrity really are a problem as this Company, through both couple group hasn't been supportive and truthful with buyer info and reports needs.
Research has discovered that Kyla Cottle also employs the fake surname Sassar (hyphen) Cottle about the corporate website as well as in expense supplies, irregular with her authorized registered title. All recognized authorized tracks of Cottle's spouse is Kyla Cottle. Traders are worried about that name-change, or displayed title change about the corporate site and expense supplies vs. Corporate appropriate files, authorized records shown in lawsuits, and public legal files; our problem is in expense account openness once we understand that Kyla Cottle has single accessibility towards the expense resources of the organization. Notice inconsistent title use cases:
(1) Kyla Sassar-Cottle displayed about the corporate website
Http://secureresolutions.com/AboutUs/ManagementTeam/tabid/67/Default. Aspx
(2) Kyla Cottle authorized title utilization on the personal home recording:
Http://recorder. Maricopa. Gov/recdocdata/GetRecDataDetail. Aspx? Rec=20030247943&suf
(3) and Kyla Cottle (not Sasser-Cottle) documented about the Safe Promises Inc.international company enrollment using the Arizona Company Commission:
Http://starpas. Azcc. Gov/scripts/cgiip. Exe/WService=wsbroker1/names-detail. P? Name-id=F11334915&type=CORPORATION
Further assessment of Safe Promises buyer packages and demonstration content utilized in Florida and Vegas expose inconsistent illustration of Cottleis proper training. Cottle promises to possess acquired a diploma from Brigham Young School, a personal Mormon school, he then offered to others a diploma from Utah State University, and today the organization site displays something obscure. When you have obtained any expense substance that fights with this specific info, please forward buyer demonstration copies towards the Arizona Corporation Commission. Contact info is situated at the very top of the website.
Http://www.secureresolutions.com/AboutUs/ManagementTeam/tabid/67/Default. Aspx
Reaction to gardner's result:
Gardner “To established the report directly, there has been no lawsuits filed against Safe Promises, Inc., by a or investor seeking financial damages".
Bill: Gardner's trying to deceive the traders of the Company for individual gain, or just joined up with Cottle for good gain. Example:
1. Former Leader and investor, Mr. Ken Tam, submitted a work state in Florida in 2006 and was granted the criticism, plus problems. Cottle's spouse was accountable for this sales/payroll problem. Cottleis were found responsible and retaliatory. Research Tamis 2006 aged situation at: http://www.dir.ca. Gov/dwc/dwc_home_page.htm
It had been discovered that panel member and million-dollar buyer John Paugh individually settled the Statement (idea for Gardner) for Mr. Tamis courtroom gain since Cottle statements not to have resources for that Plaintiff's triumph against SRI. The issue every buyer is requesting is just why was not this revealed to investors and potential traders? This suit info and resources standing wasn't revealed to more than 50 established traders. Actually different resources info was offered to traders for now interval. This issue can also be aimed to Mr. Paugh who the buyeris observe as minimal for not managing disclosure like a panel member.
2. Another instance in Illinois surfaces contains Mr. Tom Adams, a former worker, and buyer, who had been wrongfully dismissed by Cottle. Mr. Adams' legislation collection might be seen at:
Http://www.superiorcourt. Maricopa. Gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.Asp? CaseNumber=CV018317
Consequently, Mr. Adam's parents, additionally substantial Safe Promises traders, were presumably effective in a reimbursement of there opportunities inside the same negotiation. We're assured the ACC may subpoena this household and reality is likely to be informed under oath regarding deceptive and deceptive fund-raising by Douglas Cottle which pushed the negotiation – touch, under pledge to obtain around Cottle's joke contracts.
3. Another worker suit is quite private now and features a former female worker who had been apparently attacked during an outofstate tradeshow. Issues return to Cottle's origins and personality in which a comparable event resulted in his excommunicated in the Mormon (LDS not the FLDS) Chapel for misconduct by having an underage associate while helping the standard teenagers's objective. Obviously Cottle later obtained account within the Mormon Chapel; nevertheless, the act proceeds and Cottle continued to conduct buyer and sales displays for Safe Promises in strip clubs and men's groups. We're worried that Cottle is utilizing buyer resources for his individual enjoyment, legitimate defenses, and underneath the desk negotiations.
4. Another instance of possible buyer account use for individual legal protection contains another legitimate case against Cottle needing to protect herself As Time Goes By Net Worldwide vs. Douglas Cottle situation. Cottle wont launch financials to traders displaying economic responsibility but we're assured the ACC may perform some forensic sales within the 2004 – 2006 period of time.
Http://www.superiorcourt. Maricopa. Gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.Asp? CaseNumber=CV006049
Cottle employed investor resources and USDA resources to purchase an individual curiosity, Potential Net Worldwide, against USDA loan guidelines. Cottle was dismissed from Safe Promises for misuse of organization resources. Cottle visited work with Potential Net Worldwide. Although at FCG Cottle was trying to restore his placement at Safe Promises. Potential Net Worldwide dismissed Cottle for work efficiency. Cottle got reelected towards the panel and increased resources for Safe Promises which is supposed that Cottle utilized buyer resources for his legitimate protection from the Potential Net Worldwide criticism. Again, Cottle won't launch these financials to traders. The USDA has performed a study. USDA is in first place. Cottle didn't reveal this to traders. He also didn't reveal he incorrectly shifted the organization out-of Vegas to Illinois from the USDA mortgage needs, placing the mortgage in standard and never revealing this to investors, and prospective investors.
5. Another regulation collection processing instance, whether worker (w 2) or company (1099) this example suggests that though Cottle may be the Plaintiff suing eight suppliers within the same agreement problem, the fact is within the figures! Every merchant reviews exactly the same problem the item doesn't function; thus the support agreements are useless. A number of other suppliers are exceptional same problems and insufficient assistance from Safe Promises. We're viewing an implosion and therefore are worried that many crucial problems weren't revealed to traders.
Http://www.superiorcourt. Maricopa. Gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.Asp? CaseNumber=CV090960
Obviously the initial developers of the merchandise quit due to Cottleis social ineptitude. Cottle does not have the understanding to plan or direct the development group to keep performance.
We understand why resulted in the increasing loss of the only real possible cash generating companion, Panda Software. Notice End-Of Existence Notice efficient end-of 2008.
Http://www.linkedin.com/redirect? Url=http://www.pandasecurity.com/usa/enterprise/solutions/webadmin/&urlhash=sg0o&_t=mbox_mebc,
Your PI also established that Cottle used many people, in the USA of California, Illinois, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, Florida, and Hongkong. Each condition confirms that Cottle didn't document the executive M&I needs including costs and funds. A current breakthrough features a former worker in Illinois who'd an unemployment claim problem brought on by Cottleis disappointment to document a restroom software and costs using the condition (oops there is another specialized instance of a worker processing a legitimate state). We assume many states seeking motion to state fines. Again, Cottleis neglect with this expense.
We Have also discovered that under Cottleis path and spouseis responsibility, Safe Promises constantly does not precisely document corporate documents using the Arizona Corporation Commission. Observe constant overdue status each year. This really is worrying once we are worried about possible delinquencies using the government and condition, and income tax filings.
Http://starpas. Azcc. Gov/scripts/cgiip. Exe/WService=wsbroker1/names-detail. P? Name-id=F11334915&type=CORPORATION
(Click on grey switch - if present - to see notice - may start in a brand new breeze
Sees of Impending Cancellation
Day Cause
Overdue annual report
Overdue annual report
Overdue book
Here Is A cover for traders, which displays the group (not the Borg Cottle) brainpower of Cottle and Gardner, the Private Injury lawyer, who created the reaction statement:
“Finally, 'Bill' refers to a study being performed from the Arizona Corporation Commission. Because such inspections are thought private under Illinois legislation, Guaranteed Promises, Inc., isn't ready to verify or refuse that this kind of analysis exists. With that said, Guaranteed Promises, Inc. And Douglas Cottle positively condition that no courtroom or governmental organization has created any discovering that possibly has involved in virtually any misconduct or any work or scam.
Oh boy, where you can start? First, the Business's title is Safe Promises Inc, not Guaranteed Promises, Inc. And Also To assist Gardner talk Language in the place of deceiving our buyer team, YES, the Arizona Corporation Percentage is examining Safe Promises, Douglas Cottle, Lang Dao, and some others involved with prospective buyer scam. Merely begin to see the link below wherever Gardner really charged the Arizona Corporation Commission -who's protecting buyers. Therefore obviously, who's Gardner addressing? Cottle, and never the traders.
Http://www.superiorcourt. Maricopa. Gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.Asp? CaseNumber=CV091739
Gardner's appropriate control didn't quash the ACC analysis. Another instance of the waste of investor dollars. Who on the planet might prosecute the ACC to prevent the companyis basic obligation in the place of cooperating? Reply: An attorney (Gardner, this really is where the term “pathetic" might be placed) ambulance chaser aka an individual injury lawyer, that has anything to cover.
Meanwhile, back towards the problem, if you should be a, vender, employee, former employee, or anybody who might help personality statements, or expense scam accusations, please aid this investor team by distributing emails, files, agreements, published or dental, towards the Arizona Corporation Commission. Contact data is outlined in the top of the statement.
0 comments