I had been scammed with a merchant on Gunbroker.com, who required cost to get a gun, offered me the runaround for 3 months, subsequently mentioned overall the "product was sold-out". After I required a reimbursement, the seller, [email protected], held A - 20% "restocking charge". This came to over $200 he held to "restock" a paid for-in full product he was not able to ship in my experience since it was "sold-out".
I sent and sent Gunbroker.com bills of the creditcard costs displaying preliminary cost, and reimbursement without the 20%, and all emails from [email protected], a number of that have been very derogatory and inflammatory towards the finish after I was insisting on the reimbursement entirely. These emails demonstrate quite clearly that which was happening... Because Dan Hebert was so childish and unproffesional in his e-mail trades, there is no lack of info.
The service problem was available for 2 weeks, the final update from Gunbroker.com was fourteen days before, with simply no feedback or improvement record, despite numerous update questions. At this time, the only path for me personally to obtain a reimbursement entirely such as the restocking charge, is if Gunbroker.com informs the harmful merchant when they do not return the entire cost subsequently Gunbroker.com might stop the harmful suppliers consideration.
this could probably produce an extremely quick-response, whilst the merchant includes a significant amount of company through Gunbroker.com. Nevertheless, Gunbroker.com indicates no-interest in utilizing their expert to safeguard the customer, and alternatively has served to stop my consideration, and it has erased the unfavorable evaluation I quit the annoying merchant. This really is totally dishonest highlighting on illegal. Which means that Gunbrokers.com is intentionally supplying a secure location for legal action, and guarding suppliers, actually dishonest types, in the cost of the customer.
0 comments