“Document B”
Cathedral city police department
Criticism
It seems that my still imminent July 19, grievances (EventNumber 1 & EventNumber 2) from the Cathedral City Police Department (CCPD) have didn't achieve the supposed goal that ought to have set an instantaneous END towards the unprovoked and planned assaults of harassment against me. Today nuisance EventNumber 3 has happened despite the fact that CCPD’s Detective Lieutenant Laura Hanlon is within the middle of the official request into my prior nuisance grievances (View connected previously submitted August 19 criticism files described, “Document A”, “Incident #1: Racial Profiling”, and “IncidentNumber 2: Police Harassment Because Of Calling 911 on Other Officer Who I Charged of Racial Profiling”).
The newest event of nuisance happened on November 22, at about 4:49am, which CCPD conspired with citizens who—living athome address 31020 San Eljay, Cathedral Area, CA 92234 (hearafter known as “31020 San Eljay”)—allowed three CCPD cops to make use of their home like a “stake-out”.
The CCPD officers’ conspiracy was to wrongly trigger the resident’s house alarm monitoring program between your hours of 4:45am to 5:00am using the single objective to frighten me (View attached criticism described, “IncidentNumber 3: Advanced Home Video Security System Files Undeniable Proof The Cathedral City Police Team Utilized Household Tackle 31020 San Eljay Like A ‘Stake-Out’ Using The Intention to Help Frighten Me Because Of Our However Imminent May 19, Grievances Entitled ‘Incident Number 1: Racial Profiling’ and ‘IncidentNumber 2: Police Harassment Because Of Calling 911 on Other Officer Who I Charged of Racial Profiling’ ”).
Very clearly, this 3rd Event of nuisance by CCPD isn't any simple chance for that following factors: (1) 31020 San Eljay is situated only 278 legs (significantly less than a half of a stop) west of my girlfriend’s residence and lies straight in my own “to and from” strolling route, (2) Over a three-year interval, neither I or my partner—who lives significantly less than 278 feet from this house—haven't once noticed this home alarm security-system “going-off”, and (4) most of all, the time of the event happens, nearly precisely, in the same moment that I usually would keep my girlfriend’s Home and comparable period I formerly charged CCPD with Situations Number 1 & Number 2. Somewhat, the chances of the alarm “going-off” round the same period as my prior two situations using the CCPD are substantial
Similarly, their education of feeling regarding this event is huge since: I originally didn't notice an alarm sound, didn't observe any inside home lamps TurnedOn, didn't observe any exterior security floodlights TurnedOn, didn't observe any citizens within the house rushing about as though their burglar alarm has simply triggered, and—most of all—used to do not observe any cops with lights intensely looking away from border of the home to get a suspected thief. Therefore, I applaud CCPD’s option in choosing this specific house to utilize due to their sophisticated but ill conceived conspiracy strategy since anyone who lives or has existed within this neighborhood understands that 31020 San Eljay is just a decoration within the community using its remarkable dimension and its own very advanced house alarm monitoring program that has the ability to seize high resolution movie, to record exact day & time-stamps, to shop weeks of registered information on its computer drive, etc. With this specific info, I suggest to verify my accusations and proofs (View attached record described, “Allegations & Proofs”). To become more successfully illustrative, a day picture by Google Inc.—with smaller inset picture—obviously represents 31020 San Eljay sophisticated monitoring program (View attached picture labeled, “Exhibit A-Still Cameras, 360-Degree Cameras, Motion Sensors, Floodlights” and inset picture labeled, “Exhibit A-Early Morning”).
To determine, this 3rd event of unprovoked harassment has quit me psychologically troubled, traumatized, and full of panic in comprehending that a feasible potential event of CCPD nuisance might abandon me possibly seriously physically hurt or useless. Additionally, this erratic but continuous nuisance against me is just a distinct breach of my civil rights.
Thus, I obtain a complete analysis into this 3rd event of police misconduct & nuisance.
I declare under fee of perjury the foregoing holds true and proper towards the greatest of my understanding.
Cc: U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Department, California, D.C.
Cc: NAACP, National Headquarters, Baltimore, Maryland.
Cc: ACLU Strategy against Police Misconduct, NY, Nyc.
Cc: Riverside County, Attorney-General, Edmund H. Brown Jr.
Cc: Riverside County, Public Defense, Gary Windom.
Cc: City Director of Cathedral Area, Donald Bradley.
Cc: Cathedral Area, Police Chief, Stan Henry.
Cc: Personal Documents.
[email protected]
0 comments