I'm soliciting an attorney to champion a Title 42 S1983 & S1985 complaint (conspiracy to deprive due process), already filed in Phoenix Federal Court against the Prescott Police (Officers Cook & Murray and Sgt. Slocum) & Prescott City Prosecutor (Glenn Savona) et al. If you send me your firm's email address (or reporters, your organization's email address), I will send you the full complaint. Here's an abbreviated version of events.
This started out as retaliation against me for not wishing to waive my 4th Amendment right during an unlawful Terry Stop. (Caught on tape, with a witness. Officer Cook was visibly upset when he saw the recorder as I got ready to be arrested.) Retaliation grew after I found dirt and filed a complaint against the cop's supervisor. Sgt. Slocum. He had been reprimanded for a similar 4th Amendment violation by Prescott IA a year before and was under sanction. (But Prescott never acted on my complaint. The Blue Wall.)
The retaliation really intensified after it became known I had filed a successful complaint of judicial misconduct against a Superior Court judge in Prescott and he resigned. (Search for "Judge Howard Hinson" on the ROR). Officer Murray falsified numerous police reports against me. I was charged with "criminal faxing" after my attorney faxed a pleading to an opposing party on my behalf. (This was a convoluted charge, charging me criminally for a supposed violation of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. Yet I was never cited by a judge for violating the RCP and I did everything through an attorney. [As an aside, the judge in that matter, Judge C. Kenneth Ray, pierced the attorney/client privilege and was ready to compel my attorney to be questioned by the Prosecutor! ]
Because I didn't do anything wrong, I wouldn't take plea. Days before trial was scheduled, the charge, being bogus, was dismissed "in the interest of justice" (code for "we haven't got a case") by the Prosecutor. But it cost about $6000 for a criminal attorney plus enormous emotional distress and tarnishing my good Christian name. I later discovered that the Prosecutor, Glenn Savona, withheld exculpatory evidence, even tho my attorney had filed the paperwork requiring ALL exculpatory evidence be disclosed! The central issue was "willfulness" in faxing.in a later police report which Mr. Savona withheld. He writes that he knew I didn't KNOW I wasn't supposed to fax. Hence, he knew I had not violated the law!
Nevertheless, he prosecuted me.in addition to all before, this was also retribution for discovering during this time frame that another judge (Judge Mary Hamm, not yet on the ROR, but you can google my story about her) had engaged in ex parte communication with a Plaintiff at trial, causing four documents to be entered into the court file without any Notice of Filings and without being entered into evidence at trial. Should be a Class 6 felony for tampering with public records, but law enforcement won't touch it. (There's a whole 'nuther civil right lawsuit coming. Judge Mary Hamm suspended the Rules of Procedure and the Rules of Evidence, called and lead witnesses for the Plaintiff and tried to make Plaintiff's case, etc. Etc. See what fun you can have when you file a successful complaint of misconduct against a judge?)
Regarding the initial police incident, I have the audio from Prescott Dispatch. Officer Cook was asked to make a personal call. Then, WITHOUT BEING dispatched, he proceeded outside the city limits to make contact with me. When he came to the door asking me to "step outside, " I asked if I was under arrest. He said "no." I then told him "No consent" and started to close the door. Whereupon he put his foot in the door and told me I was being "detained." Thus starts the unlawful seizure. As I said before, I have this all on tape. We read the law together on "detaining" (A.R.S. 13-2412). The law clearly states that if one is being lawfully detained, you only have to give your full legal name. Which I eventually did, even tho I do not believe this was a lawful detention. (No crime had been committed or alleged to have been committed in any reasonable time frame. They were ostensibly investigating something from three months prior.) Yet despite the clear wording of the law, under color of law, they threatened me with arrest if I did not disclose other personal information. I emptied my pockets anticipating arrest, but announcing "under duress, " sadly I acquiesced and gave the officers information I did not have to give. My criminal attorney, Marc Victor, told me that if they had arrested me, we would have gone "Federal." So I know this is a good case to reinforce Terry stops.
There may also be religious discrimination/retaliation involved here, as it relates to two churches in Prescott, the First Baptist Church and the Mormon church. Taking the latter first, as the EDitor knows, I am a Christian Evangelist to the Mormon people and have been a fixture at the Mesa, Arizona temple for some time, talking about the Bible with Mormons. Mormons call me an "Anti-, " short for "Anti-Mormon" (even though I love the Mormon people and wish them to be saved from hell). (Search YouTube for "Mormon Mayhem") Evidence had been presented to the Prescott Police (and Judge Hamm) that I was an "Anti-Mormon."
Also as the EDitor here knows from his personal experience, Mormons will sometimes use their position of power to frustrate Evangelical Christians like myself. (Search the ROR for the Mesa, Arizona Police Department, which is heavily LDS.) It turns out that Judge Hamm is Mormon. If any of the named parties in this particular lawsuit are also LDS, then considering the oath of allegiance Mormons make to their church in their temple ceremony, called the "Law of Consecration" where you swear to use EVERYTHING to build up the Mormon church (I have Affidavits from current and former Mormons about it) and considering that, prior to 1990, it was acted out in the Mormon temple that ministers like myself are "hirelings of Satan" (per a Time Magazine article and also Affidavit) there may be a large conspiracy here to deprive me of my due process rights. (If so, the Mormon church will tell their puppets to settle out of court. They hate publicity about the temple ceremony. So take this to heart if you're an attorney considering helping me.)
As to the First Baptist Church of Prescott, it is a large mega-church located adjacent to the Police Station and the Prescott Prosecutor's office. It has an unusually large influence in Prescott and I have made a stink about them with regard to sin. If any of the actors are members of First Baptist, there could be a conspiracy here, for the antagonist in all these actions against me is a prominent woman in the First Baptist Church of Prescott. It appears that much of what was done to me was a personal favor to her. For example, it was she who Officer Cook called when he made contact with me. Also, I have reason to believe the clerk of the court who tampered with the court file is a member of First Baptist and personally knows the antagonist in this convoluted matter.
The Prescott City Attorney purposely delayed answering Open Record Requests until the one year time limit for a State suit expired. Even Judge Arthur Markham "un-recused" himself in a trial of mine to rule against me. And so it goes.
Again, if you desire more information, please contact me via your law firm or media outlet email.
0 comments