Usacomplaints.com » Miscellaneous » Complaint / Review: Sherry Nelles-Pedersen - Sherry Nelles-Pedersen is a deadbeat mom, and mentally abuses her children on a regular basis. #252208

Complaint / Review
Sherry Nelles-Pedersen
Sherry Nelles-Pedersen is a deadbeat mom, and mentally abuses her children on a regular basis

For 13 years, Michael has never received a paycheck from which at least 28% in child support was not automatically deducted by his employer, and expedited to his children's mother, Sherry Nelles-Pedersen, through the ISDU (Illinois State Disbursement Unit). He has ALL his paycheck stubs from the last decade to back it up.

Yet, Sherry Nelles-Pedersen tells everyone who will listen, that Michael is a deadbeat dad, falsely smearing his good name.

In fact, the only time Michael did not contribute child support during the last 13 years that he and Sherry Nelles-Pedersen have been divorced, was during a brief period of 8 months, after a surprise layoff left him searching for employment. Michael has also obtained copies of his unemployment paperwork to attest to this fact.

Not only has Michael adhered to the letter of the law, additionally, during one of Sherry's numerous hospitalizations for mental instability, including, bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, adult ADD, and severe clinical depression, Michael was awarded sole custody of his boys. Sherry willingly handed them over to Michael, as the cocktail of Prozac, Lithium, Depakote and Geodon she had been on for years started to take its toll on her and the children. Michael also has documentation of the court order that details this decision.

During that time, Michael not only waived his right to receive child support from Sherry, but supported her financially, as well.

And how does Sherry Nelles-Pedersen repay Michael for his kindness during her illness?

Now that Michael is on temporary disability due to the open-heart surgery he had just two months ago, his ex-wife, Sherry Nelles-Pedersen, is desperately trying to kick him when he's down.

With a $40,000 medical bill looming over his head, Michael will have to spend money he does not have to pay a lawyer to defend him, even though his is a clear-cut case. He is currently earning only 65% of his paycheck on disability insurance, and should therefore, for the duration of his disability, only have to pay 65% of the normal child support payment. All he needs is a signature from Sherry stating that she's not contesting that motion.

Makes sense, right?

Well, not in Sherry's warped world. She has already postponed the court date twice, and has recently taken to berating the children because, according to Sherry, if it wasn't for them, their father wouldn't constantly be dragging her into court.

Yet, Michael turns the other cheek, and continues to do the right thing.

Unlike his ex-wife, who, in the last 13 years, has paraded an endless line of uncles past Michael's children, even going as far as to ask Michael to give up parental rights, so that one of those men could adopt Michael's sons.

It's a good thing Michael held firm in his decision not to allow Sherry's second husband to adopt his children.

That was the scumbag beat Michael's sons on a regular basis, leaving one of them with permanent scarring, stole everything that Sherry owned, and wrecked the family car driving an overly-amorous ex-girlfriend home. When he was thoroughly done using Sherry, he disappeared.

That was the man that Michael's ex-wife chose over him. Even though Michael pleaded with Sherry to go to counseling with him, for the benefit of the family they had created together, he was unequivocally rebuffed, when Sherry used his credit card to pay for a motel rendezvous with her new lover, on the 10th anniversary of their wedding.

The second time, she married an unemployed, younger man, who barely finished high school. To complicate matters, she had a third child with this man. During her pregnancy, Sherry Nelles-Pedersen was placed on bed rest, to which Michael and his new wife responded by taking over most of the transportation-related responsibilities, until such a time as the baby was born, and Sherry was back on her feet. At least that was the agreement. Unfortunately, it was a verbal agreement, and too easy for Sherry to ignore. Michael soon found out that if wanted to see his children, he would be the one making all the effort.

Recently, Michael's ex-wife pulled up in her newly-leased car, equipped with the latest in technology and entertainment. "How do you like what your child support bought?" she asked.

Sherry spends much of her time decorating and re-decorating her house, while Michael and his current wife live in debt.

In response to his newly-weakened state, Sherry has recently instituted a campaign of harassment towards Michael. Her actions, from the simply mean-spirited, like telling Michael's sons that their father does not love or care about them, to the downright illegal, like attempting to have his new wife arrested on trumped up charges of assault, speak for themselves.

Sherry Nelles-Pedersen is the poster child for a deadbeat mom.

Even though one of Sherry's ONLY responsibilities towards the children is maintaining their medical care, Michael's sons have not been to a doctor or dentist in ages, and as a result, his younger son was recently diagnosed with 23 cavities!

Michael and Sherry's arrangement is "joint custody" although in the past, Sherry would often not allow Michael to see his kids, something that she is legally not allowed to do. When he started earning a little more money last year, she sued for more. When Michael's father died, Sherry asked Michael's mother for $1,500 to buy 2 suits for the boys to wear to the funeral, even though two boys sized suits can be easily bought for a tenth of that cost.

Still, Michael is lucky. Many men, who go through the same thing, are not being allowed to see their children at all by the very women they support. Nobody stops these women from doing this, but everyone makes sure the men keep paying.

Michael's boys, now driving age, come to see him of their own volition. Shirking the custodial visitation schedule, they spend as much time at their father's house as possible.

We all know there are deadbeat dads: men who do not contribute what they could of their share of the costs of their children. Michael is not one of these men.

How many deadbeat moms are there?

By deadbeat moms I don't mean non-custodial mothers, who default on child support at twice the rate of fathers, though only asked to pay half as much yes, this is a fact.

I don't even mean the huge number of welfare moms that are generated by that system itself, since, to some extent or other, it does encourage less capable young ladies, like Sherry Nelles-Pedersen, to get pregnant and assure themselves a basic existence instead of having to earn one. (An option not open to men.)

No. When I say deadbeat moms, I mean women who use children for personal profit. I mean women who collect faithfully paid child support from men like Michael, and make no contribution to the cost of their children themselves. I'm talking about women who usurp the system to get more money than the care-giving requires.
I mean women who collect child support selfishly for themselves, like Sherry Nelles-Pedersen.

After all, if a deadbeat dad is a man who does not contribute what he can to his share of the cost of his children, what would you call a woman who does the same?

Sherry is not satisfied with the $1,300 she receives from Michael every month, even though it is more than enough to pay for his children's needs. The reason for this is that her current husband is unemployed.

It must be difficult to raise 3 children, an immature husband, and yourself on your ex-husband's child support money. Just like the most deplorable addicts and criminals, these women are able to justify stealing from their own children.

You would think there would be a great many women anxious to root such women out. You'd think we'd see a fervent social campaign, led by women, to find and eliminate this practice. Women who cheat are a threat to all women, giving all women a bad name by violating the sacred trust that has always balanced the sexes. Who could trust any woman if that sort of thing got around? So you'd think women would engage in a furious campaign against it.

You'd especially expect this of feminists. How could they allow women to exploit their gender-position and the other gender? Before they could cry against it in men, they'd want it eliminated from themselves.

Considering the number of deadbeat moms, it's surprising how little effort, money, and attention is spent on their prevention and cure. It could make you think this society is sexist.

Westernburban
Small Town, Illinois
U.S.A.


Offender: Sherry Nelles-Pedersen

Country: USA   State: Illinois   City: Geneva

Category: Miscellaneous

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google