The modelingscams.com' website attempted to gain credibility by supposedly quoting unnamed "alleged victims" and if they are real quotes, they are using the same website (source) as the sole reference to the legitimacy of the company in question (not a biased approach to say the least)! Some of the quotes read like consumers who had buyers remorse while others simply use this website as the reason they concluded the company was a scam.'
Published throughout the website were unsubstantiated heresy and stories that cannot be concluded as credible when the authors of these short stories are not properly identified (contact information, first and last name) NOR is the author of the website identified that supposedly posts these true' stories on the internet. Now how believable can that be?
Http://www.spaethcom.com/library/news_article_washbusjournal.html
http://www.catholiccincinnati.org/tct/nov1403/111403i-team.html
http://spj.org/awards_sdx_gallery/02_invest.Asp
http://www.ire. Umd. Edu/libel.html
http://www.mtn.org/~newscncl/complaints/hearings/det_126.html
http://www.mtn.org/~newscncl/complaints/hearings/news.html
http://www.mtn.org/~newscncl/newsworthy/articles/j-shelby.html
0 comments