Usacomplaints.com » Cars & Transport » Complaint / Review: C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Inc - Each of contract/denying valid claims. #513758

Complaint / Review
C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Inc
Each of contract/denying valid claims

I purchased this car on 8/12/09 off an automobile ton, and was worried about the high-mileage. Who owns the vehicle lot supplied me having a 3-month unlimited mileage warranty through C.A.R.S. Safety Plus, Inc. To help ease my brain.

Significantly less than 100 miles after I'd the automobile, the rear axle went. I named C.A.R.S., plus they explained to go to some licensed technician of my option and also to possess the technician contact C.A.R.S. At that time, C.A.R.S. Told the technician to disassemble the entire tail, along with a C.A.R.S. Consultant could examine it. The technician discovered a ruined showing among different damaged components in the dirt within the rear axle. Additionally upon examination, the technician discovered a damaged resume combined and poor ball joints about the front-end.

The automobile lay there disassembled for over 1 week before a C.A.R.S. Consultant arrived to check out it, which left me with no car in this period of time. The technician named me three times in AROW stating the C.A.R.S. Consultant could be there that evening and not turned up.

Once The C.A.R.S. Consultant did appear, he explained they wouldn't purchase it, simply because they don't protect any wearable components. For me, all on the car is wearable, and nowhere within their agreement does it state that they don't address wearable components. Shown within the agreement, are particular items which are coated, and also the "drive axle construction" was outlined stating "any internal lubricated parts, top and rear-drive axle, property and all inner parts, bearings, wheel bearings, aspect provider bearings, band and pinion part gears, index gears, etc."

This left me having a disassembled automobile, which needed to be fixed, which set me out $1,300. Had C.A.R.S. Not had the technician disassemble the rear axle, I really could have set it myself a great deal cheaper. I did so anything I had been informed to complete by C.A.R.S., plus they didn't recognize their agreement. Not just am I out the $1,300, but I'm still taking a look at repairs for that resume combined and also the ball joints, that they likewise refused the state on.

On September 30, I required a published notice of refusal from C.A.R.S., that we haven't yet obtained. I’ve completed lots of on line study on C.A.R.S., and discovered several class action fits previously along with a large amount of bad feedback about them.


Offender: C.A.R.S. Protection Plus, Inc

Country: USA   State: Pennsylvania   City: Murrysville
Site:

Category: Cars & Transport

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google