To whom it might worry: March 30
Purpose:
I've approached one to request your division to research the “deceptive” company guidelines of DirecTV; specifically, evaluating termination fess with no priori declaring a contractual responsibility was required when DirecTV’s faulty equipment is changed. Additionally, I request the $440.00 termination charge assessed against me by DirecTV be announced null and emptiness. Following, I'll provide persuasive proof that my criticism isn't an isolated situation but a planned act of scam.
• you will find school action law-suits against DirecTV that's much like my costs against DirecTV – connection 1 [ 2 pages]
• The literature is stuffed using the same typical stand of no previous notice of the deal when changing defective gear and upcoming cancellations costs – connection 2. [ 5 pages]
I've approached the AG of Pennsylvania - they're examining - since I have have inititiated this course of action, I had been approached by boss Office of DirTV and my healthy was modified to zero.
0 comments