Hartford insurance refuses to pay the claim of a family who suffered a total fire loss in 7/05. Hartford investigators determined the cause of the fire and hired attorneys to subrogate the claim. Meanwhile hartford refuses to pay the family who suffeed the fire, refused to pay their temporary living expenses includes lease which caused the family to lose their temp home forcing them out on the street for the second time since the fire.
Since 10/5/05 the family has be without a home/address, and hartford even after numerous calls to ceo ramani ayer, his assistant sharon, and general adjustor dorothy pawloski and hartfords attorney michael ludwig refuse to provide the family housing despite a policy which covers such costs.
HARTFORD HAS ACTED IN BAD FAITH, HAS BREECHED THE CONTRACT THEY ACCEPTED WITH THE FAMILY, AND THERE "exists no reason to deny said claim and the claim is not attributable to any need to investigate". THEREFORE HARTFORD HAS LEGAL OR ETHICAL REASON TO REFUSE TO PROCESS THE VICTIMS CLAIM.
Hartford has acted with malious intent by refusing to pay the victims claims, when there exists no reason to deny the claim and the claim is not attributable to any need to investigate.
Lawyers take notice; this is a pattern of behavior ripe for class action status not withstanding actions in mississippi, and louisiana.
0 comments