COMPANIES
SUBMIT A COMPLAINT
CONTACT US
CATEGORIES
Advertising
Animals & Birds
Art & Creative Work
Beauty & Appearance
Business & Finance
Cafes, Bars, Restaurants
Career & Work
Cars & Transport
Cinemas & Theaters
Computers & Services
Construction & Repair
Clothing & Footwear
Dating
Education & Science
Electronics and household app.
Foodstuff
Furniture & Equipment
Games & Gaming process
Health & Medicine
Internet & Web
Online Scam
Lawyers & Legal Counseling
Literature & Books
Mobile Phones
Music & Show-business
Newspapers & Magazines
Politics & Government
People
Real Estate
Recreation & Entertainment
Religion, Society, Culture
Scam, Fake
Security
Shops, Products, Services
Sports
Telecommunications
Traveling & Tourism
TV & Radio
Miscellaneous
Search complaints
Login:
Password (
forgot?
)
Don't remember me
Sign in
Registration
Login with socials:
SUBMIT A COMPLAINT
Usacomplaints.com
»
Advertising
» Complaint / Review: DirecTV - No Phone Numbers to Reach Real People With Answers. #636234
Complaint / Review
DirecTV
No Phone Numbers to Reach Real People With Answers
Illing. Lack if phone numbers for real people with real answers.
Author:
nomolunchtime
Permalink to review
Offender:
DirecTV
View DIRECTV full profile & all complaints
Country:
USA
Category:
Advertising
Related Complaints
Directv
No Extension Allowed on $100 Balance
Directv
Over-Billing and Warning Not to Give Bank Details
Directv
Moving Fee Should Be Spread Over Several Months of Billing
DirecTV
Billed Ten Months After Cancelling, $1,305.20 Refund Denied
DirecTV
Impossible to Reach a Real Person on the Phone
DirecTV
Charged $180 Cancellation Fee After Cancelling Verizon Bundle
Directv
Repeated overbilling on Verizon bundle and early cancellation dispute
DirecTV
Qwest Error Canceled TV Account, Now Early Cancellation Fee
Directv
Billing errors always in their favor, switching back to Dish
0
comments
<
>
Information
Only registered
users can leave comments.
Please
Register
on our website, it will take a few seconds.
REGISTRATION
Quick Registration
via social networks:
0 comments