Usacomplaints.com » Shops, Products, Services » Complaint / Review: Commercial Investigations - Biggest Rip Off. #682963

Complaint / Review
Commercial Investigations
Biggest Rip Off

CII or Industrial Investigations Inc. Had named our organization and desired to understand if we'd any selections that people might wish to start for them. They stated simply provide them with something to provide them an opportunity. The person we spoke to was called Joe Striker. Therefore we did, we switched to them a business that owed us over $13,000. Therefore we determined hello so what can it harm. Allow this collection company have a break at it. When they perform a great work, then perhaps we are able to utilize them. They'd it to get a handful of months, and named to express they will have to an attorney and they might provide lawsuit facing the corporation and obtain everything gathered - provided 18% for collection costs. It had been likely to charge us upfront $3,800 to obtain the ball rolling. Which was all our upfront expenses were likely to be! We believed excellent, that seemed about right. They'd provided us lots of info on the corporation that owed us cash. Therefore we reduce them a check and delivered it for them - we slice the check 2/26/09. Well, we did not notice from their store for awhile - 2 perhaps 3 months. I named them since I had been receiving dubious plus they delivered me to the lawyer's workplace - spoke to Felicia, the attorneyis repetition there and he or she stated that the lawyer was still researching the documents. They'd contact people when the attorney was completed researching anything. Seemed great. Well, in regards to a week later they named and stated that they desired to perform a "Fast-Track" lawsuit simply because they stated that organization we'd switched to them had over $100,000 within their banking account, plus they desired to place a freeze on the account to ensure that we're able to get our cash, all stated and along we'd get $25,000. They attorney was seeking one more $4,400 to continue with this particular. These were declaring it'd to be achieved that evening, we'd to do something quickly and instantly. Calling every 30 min…. We ultimately informed them "No, we didn't possess the cash." They stated that we'dnot get just as much also it was likely to have a lot longer to obtain our cash. We stated that was good, we simply needed that which was owed to us and contains been this long, we are able to wait longer. We chose to contact our attorney and find out when they were the best collection agency of course if they'd really introduced lawsuit facing that company…. He e mailed us back and informed us to not provide them with anymore money, these were actually an assortment company, but informed people to not provide them with anymore money. He also stated that they'd not introduced lawsuit facing that organization that people had switched to them.By Mar 31st they'd not introduced any lawsuit against that organization. Subsequently in regards to a week to fourteen days later, they named and stated that the attorneys were seeking one more $2,400 or $2,800, something similar to that, to carry on using the lawsuit. I told them-they had a need to call-back and keep in touch with the dog owner. So that they did. She believed to them that she desired to understand wherever all of the $3,800 choose to go to - she needed a dysfunction and evidence of the things they have been doing. She also stated that she needed a bill for that cash that she delivered to them. She told them that she worked to get a lawyer which the $3,800 was lots of money to complete the things they had a need to gather the cash. He informed her he'd have his assistant get that to us immediately. Well, they named again yesterday around 5 pm and stated that the attorney is seeking one more $4,200. I told them no, which the dog owner desired to talk to them. The dog owner talked for them again. She described that she's never obtained a bill which she's never obtained a dysfunction where all of the cash went to that she's delivered them previously. He explained he would need to consider that and contact her back. She required his name, he just offered her his first name. While she required his lastname, he hung-up on her behalf. She called back later, and required to speak with somebody. The assistant stated that everybody had quit for that evening. The dog owner stated "No they did not, it's just 4 pm your own time, and that I understand to get a proven fact that they're still operating." The assistant stated that she did not understand something that she was only a assistant which she'd abandon an email for that individual to contact her.


Offender: Commercial Investigations

Country: USA

Category: Shops, Products, Services

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google