I believe it’s about-time for that public to become freely important concerning the exercise of fluoridation - especially its impact on babies and kids.
- May Be The technology that's appeared during the last 10 years displaying proof that fluoride is more poisonous than guide, as well as in second quantities, could it be harmful towards the mind of developing kids, and lowering their IQ?
- Are silicofluorides (the commercial waste put in our water) 85 times more poisonous than naturally occurring calcium fluoride? Was the study to show the security and usefulness of fluoride completed utilizing calcium fluoride and never silicofluorides?
- Is statistical proof demonstrating that it's adding several illnesses procedures?
- Why would be the dental expenses higher in towns utilizing fluoridation from elevated frequency of dental fluorosis?
- Why did the Environmental Protection Agency researchers determine the exercise of fluoridation shouldn't be properly used within the public water-supply “as an automobile for distributing this poisonous and prophylactically ineffective... Material."
- Does the Food suggest that fluoride it's a prescription medication? If this is actually the situation, does silicofluoride meet up with the legitimate needs of security and usefulness essential for acceptance for a baby or kid to ingest? Why does the American Dental Association complement routine recommend that that fluoride prescription medications shouldn't get to babies under six months old? Is one-cup of water daily for kids age six months to THREE YEARS equal to the complement managed measure?
-Why has got the most of developed nations ceased, declined or instantly banned fluoridation after studying its danger towards the community?
0 comments