I used CRCS in an attempt to arbitrate a contract dispute and a divorce including child custody.
A) They failed to uphold a signed contract despite all parties admitting to the intent of the contract. The contract was for the purchase of a property by 4 partners (my ex wife and I and two others). The contract stated that the property could not be liquidated without unanimous content. My ex wife and I were minority holders. She wanted to force the partners to buy us out so that the funds could be made available for the divorce.
Justification for their failure to uphold a signed contract was a 'mistake' in filing the deed on the property. All parties thought the deed was filed in the proper way and the real estate attorney ensured us it wasn't.instead of 'correcting' the clear mistake (which they admit the deed was a mistake and not the intent of the parties involved), they used it as a loophole to invalidate the contract.
B) They failed to stand behind / defend their decision on child custody when it was challenged by my ex in court. They advertised the arbitration as binding, told us that the arbitration agreement which stated issues settled by this arbitration may not be later litigated in court. They crafted an faulty decision that was not 'enforceable' and ultimately allowed my ex to challenge the custody provisions independently of the asset provisions allowing a final outcome that even CRCS admits was 'unjust'.
Bottom line, their decisions are non-biblical, do not respect contract law, and are ultimately unenforceable in court making the thousands (10K) spent on their services a waist.
0 comments