Discuss deficiencies in integrity! Reply.com totally misrepresents themselves
I had been approached by Reply.com and questioned basically was thinking about spending money on "qualified prospects". They stated I'd just spend $54 when the guide was great and, or even, I really could deliver it back again to them. I'd obtain as much as 8 brings monthly and that I might have 72 hours to deliver the cause back.
Reply.com stated the prospects were discovered online and they were certified since the prospects visited an image having said that "Relate Solely To an area agent". I had been guaranteed the prospects were really requesting to be approached.
After calling several prospects and having them inform me they didn't request to become approached, I attempted to get a credit. I had been informed by Response they weren't accountable if your guide had a big change of center and were no further involved. They again assured me the prospects were requesting to become approached with a agent.
Therefore, I requested the Response consultant to wander me through the internet qualifying procedure. It had been nothing beats they explained!!! Fundamentally, for individuals to find particular property sites, these were requested to join up. At the end of the enrollment, there is a disclaimer stating the info could be submitted to some agent. The Response repetition stated it was the same as requesting an agent to get hold of them straight
They declined to credit me and insisted the prospects were certified. I'd not need an issue with this specific organization when they explained the procedure precisely. Nevertheless, they totally misrepresented themselves and also the quality of the prospects. Additionally, should you get a credit to get a guide, they instantly substitute the lead with a different one. Therefore, if you should be registered to get 8 leads monthly... You ostensibly should spend $432 per month simply because they may simply keep delivering you increasingly more prospects.
I truly don't such as this organization and certainly will not be using the services of them!
0 comments