Steve Glickman committed a blatant act of perjury while defending himself in court on charges of fraud. The crucial element in showing Glickman's fraud has to do with the date October 10 th. Pay attention please.
Steve Glickman was my attorney in suing surgeon Richard Fischel for fraud. The defense filed a motion to dismiss my punitive damages claim, the real teeth of my lawsuit. This was based on supposedly missing a 2-year statute of limitations. California code 425.13 states that a claim for punitive damages must be filed no more than 2 years after the original case is filed. My original case was filed October 10. The claim for punitive damages was filed October 7. That's less than two years.
At the time of the motion to dismiss, Steve Glickman lied and said the statute of limitations was 2 years AFTER THE DATE OF INJURY.in other words, he lied to me. Steve Glickman DID NOT OPPOSE the motion to dismiss. This effectively destroyed my case against Dr. Fischel.
I am suing Steve Glickman for this fraud.in court, under oath, Steve Glickman stated that he was substituted in to my case on October 12, after my statute for punitive damages had expired. Glickman stated that this was why he did not oppose the motion to strike. This is a provable lie.
Steve Glickman himself wrote and filed the punitive damages claim on October 7. It is stamped and certified by the clerk of Orange County Superior Court.
Below is my fraud complaint against Glickman. His "Defendant's Trial Brief", in which he falsely claims to have been substituted in on October 12. A photocopy of the documents, including the trial brief, may be viewed here:
Http://steveglickman. Blogspot.com/05/steve-glickman-defendants-trial-brief.html
Beverly Hills Small Claims Court
Alexander Baker
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Steve Glickman
Glickman & Glickman, A Law Corporation
9460 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 830
Beverly Hills, CA 91212
Defendant)
)
Case No.: BH 09S00432
Statement of Claim
The evidence will show that the defendant, attorney Steve Glickman, is a fraud. As my attorney, Mr. Glickman deceived me repeatedly, I relied upon those deceptions, and I was harmed as a result. Mr. Glickman was retained to prosecute my action against a surgeon named Richard Fischel, in what the evidence will show was a very winnable case. Mr. Glickman, of course, had a duty to prosecute my case to the fullest extent of the law.instead, the evidence will show that he conspired with the defense attorneys to systematically dismiss the elements of my case, piece by piece, and put forth a clear effort to lose. Eventually, on the eve of trial, Steve Glickman insisted that I dismiss my case against Dr. Fischel altogether, or else I would have to act as my own attorney.
Facts (underlying case against Dr. Fischel)
1. Prior to October I was successful in the business of writing music.
2.in October at the hands of Richard Fischel MD, Ph. D., I underwent a surgery called ETS. This was to treat an embarrassing cosmetic problem I had with excessive facial sweating (hyperhidrosis).
3. Dr. Fischel had a legal duty to inform me about the known risks of ETS surgery.
4. Pre-Op, Dr. Fischel warned me about exactly 2 possible side effects - Horner's Syndrome which he said was a little bit of a droopy eyelid and Compensatory Sweating which he said was mild moistness on the lower body (see exhibit 14 - my consultation notes, exhibit 9 - CD-ROM transcript, exhibit 1 Fischel's consultation notes, p. 7).
5. Dr. Fischel stated that there was a 0% chance of Horner's Syndrome (see exhibit D), and a 1% chance of Compensatory Sweating (see exhibit 9 - CD-ROM transcript).
6. Dr. Fischel's website mentioned only the same 2 side effects (see exhibit 6 - hyperhidrosis. La website).
7. Dr. Fischel's educational CD-ROM video mentioned only the same 2 side effects (see exhibit 9 - CD-ROM transcript).
8. Dr. Fischel himself, in a prior court case, mentioned only the same 2 side effects, and stated under oath that he always gave the same routine speech to all his prospective ETS surgery patients (see testimony in Driscoll v Fischel, p. 17, line 15; excerpted in exhibit 20).
9.3 other Fischel patients provided declarations indicating that they had been warned only of the same 2 side effects (see declarations by Brody, Mahan and Zacarias).
10. I had taken handwritten notes during my consultation, and they indicated only the same 2 side effects (see exhibit 14 - my consultation notes).
11. Dr. Fischel's own notes taken during the consultation indicate only the same 2 side effects (see Exhibit 1 - Fischel Office Consultation, p. 7)
12. After ETS surgery, beginning in November of I complained to Dr. Fischel of many physical and mental problems I was having, including severe pain, and a very weak heartbeat.
13.in November Dr. Fischel gave me an EKG treadmill test, in which my heart rate could only go up to 110 beats per minute (see exhibit 1 - medical records. Normal maximum heart rate for a 42 year old man is 180-200 beats per minute.
14. At the EKG session, Dr. Fischel stated there was no possible way that ETS surgery could affect the heart. He suggested I was out of shape (see exhibit 1 - medical records).
15.in May Dr. Fischel wrote a letter to me, post-op, in which he admitted warning of only 2 side effects.in the same letter Dr. Fischel stated Your cardiac complaints are a mystery to me (see exhibit 3 - Fischel letter, p. 5).
16. Eventually, during the course of my lawsuit against him, Dr. Fischel claimed to have warned me about 6 side effects, including heart problems (Fischel deposition p. 26, line 18-25), anhidrosis (Fischel deposition p. 126 line 13 p. 127, line 13), changes to the sensation of touch (Fischel deposition p. 111, line 1), and chronic nerve pain (Fischel deposition p. 130, line 23). (Deposition excerpts are exhibit 20).
17. ETS surgery involves cutting out parts of the Sympathetic Nervous System. These parts, known as T2, T3, and T4, provide nerve function to the heart, the lungs, the blood vessels, the thyroid gland, sweat glands, fat tissue, sensory nerves, bone, bone marrow, and other organs glands and muscles.
18. ETS surgery is disabling. The words disabled and disabling appear in the medical literature with regard to ETS surgery (see Are We Paying a High Price for Surgical Sympathectomy? Abstract).
19. ETS surgery is proven in the published medical literature to cause dysfunction of the heart, the lungs, the blood vessels, arrector pili muscles, thyroid gland, skin, bone, bone marrow, sensory nerves, and other organs glands and muscles.
20. ETS surgery destroys all sweating on the top 1/3 of the body, a condition called anhidrosis.
21. ETS surgery causes excessive sweating on the lower 2/3 of the body, a condition known as hyperhidrosis. The published literature indicates that the total amount of sweating increases after sympathectomy. Thus Dr. Fischel was attempting to treat excessive sweating by causing more excessive sweating (see exhibit 56 - The Effect of Upper Dorsal Sympathectomy on Total Body Perspiration).
22. ETS surgery is psycho-surgery. ETS is routinely used to treat psychiatric conditions such as panic attacks and schizophrenia, because it profoundly decreases the ability to experience fear, thrills and excitement (see exhibit 60).
23. After ETS, I found it extremely difficult to continue my career of writing music, because the missing emotions have rendered music meaningless.
24. ETS surgery greatly compromises temperature regulation (see thermal image). When pressed, Dr. Fischel likened ETS to removing the thermostat (Fischel deposition p. 106, line 1)
25. ETS surgery greatly compromises exercise capacity (see exhibit 57 - Effects of Endoscopic Transthoracic Sympathectomy on Hemodynamic and Neurohumoral Responses to Exercise in Humans, graphs on page 3).
26.in November I participated in a study of ETS patients at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (see exhibit 12).
27. The NINDS study on me provided empirical confirmation of disability to my heart, blood vessels, thyroid, temperature regulation, and blood chemistry, all caused by ETS surgery (see exhibit 12, also heart and thyroid PET scans).
Facts (case against Steve Glickman)
1.in September I retained attorney Steve Glickman to prosecute Dr. Fischel for fraud.
2. Steve Glickman was aware of my injuries, and aware of my documentation showing the injuries.
3. Steve Glickman drafted a fraud complaint against Dr. Fischel. The complaint only dealt with the issue of sweating. The complaint did not mention my heart, nor my lungs, nor my blood vessels, nor my thyroid gland. It did not mention the fact that the top 1/3 of my body was 10 degrees hotter than the lower 2/3, nor did it mention the issue of temperature regulation at all. The complaint did not mention the fact that ETS is psychosurgery, nor my resulting damages, mental and financial. (see exhibit 52, Complaint)
4. Steve Glickman filed the complaint before giving me a chance to read it.
5. Upon reading the complaint written by Mr. Glickman, I immediately asked him to please amend the complaint, and to please include my injuries and damages.
6. Steve Glickman refused to amend the complaint, and informed me that I had a right to act as my own attorney.
7. Prior to retaining Mr. Glickman, I contacted Dr. Jeff Victoroff, an expert neuro-psychiatrist who was happy to dialog with me. Dr. Victoroff was very interested in my case, and stated in an email that he thought it would be very difficult to write music after ETS surgery.
8.in about Novemeber Steve Glickman stated that he had spoken to Dr. Victoroff, who had changed his mind, and no longer wanted to testify in my case. Mr. Glickman emphasized that I was not to contact Dr. Victoroff ever again.
9. Several times during the course of the case, I suggested to Mr. Glickman that we should request a copy of the EKG treadmill test performed on me.
10. Steve Glickman never requested a copy of my EKG treadmill test from Dr. Fischel, but he did remind me that I had a right to act as my own attorney.
11. Requesting medical records is Standard Operating Procedure in all medical lawsuits.
12.in January Dr. Fischel's defense motioned to dismiss my punitive damages claim (see exhibit 53 - Motion to Strike Punitive Damages).
13. The statute of limitations in a fraud action is 3 years.
14. Steve Glickman stated to me that there was a separate 2-year statute of limitations on a punitive damages claim, and that we had missed it.
15. Steve Glickman refused to allow me to be present at the January hearing for Motion to Strike Punitive Damages. I asked Mr. Glickman if I had a right to be present, and he answered Yes, and you also have the right to act as your own attorney. At the hearing, Steve Glickman agreed to dismiss my punitive damages claim, without opposition.
16. Next, in about February Steve Glickman insisted that I dismiss my loss of earnings claim. Mr. Glickman never suggested my loss of earnings claim was without merit. Rather, he warned me that the defense investigation would go out of their way to cause problems with our biggest client.
17.in about February there was a Mandatory Settlement Conference. We met Steve Glickman at the courthouse and had lunch with him in the cafeteria. Mr. Glickman specifically forbid us from entering the courtroom.
18. From February through March Steve Glickman began insisting that I dismiss my entire case against Dr. Fischel. I refused, and I became increasingly confused and upset.
19. Mr. Glickman scheduled depositions of defense experts for February 6, and allowed a mere 1 hour for each deposition. For reasons unknown, these depositions never took place (exhibit 54).
20.in about March Steve Glickman said that if I still wanted to go to trial, he could not represent me. For about the eighth time, Steve Glickman said I had the right to act as my own attorney.
21. I felt I had no choice but to dismiss the case, so I did.
22.in February when I picked up my case file from Steve Glickman's office, conspicuously absent was Dr. Fischel's Educational CD-ROM video. Also missing were the signed declarations from past Fischel patients Chris Brody, Kerrigan Mahan, and Mitchell Zacarias.
Count 1 Fraud
Steve Glickman intentionally omitted from the complaint all of my most serious injuries. This was a deliberate deception intended to protect the interest of Dr. Fischel. I relied upon this deception, and I was harmed by it.
Count 2 Fraud
Steve Glickman intentionally removed an expert witness from the case. This was a deliberate deception intended to protect the interest of Dr. Fischel. I relied upon this deception, and I was harmed by it.
Count 3 Fraud
Steve Glickman refused to request a key medical record (the post-op EKG) that was being concealed by the defense. This was a deliberate deception intended to protect the interest of Dr. Fischel. I relied upon this deception, and I was harmed by it.
Count 4 Fraud
Steve Glickman conspired with the defense to fabricate out of whole cloth a fictitious 2-year statute of limitations for punitive damages in a fraud action. This was done to dismiss my punitive damages claim, protecting the interest of Dr. Fischel. I relied upon this deception, and I was harmed by it.
Count 5 Fraud
Steve Glickman intentionally destroyed the CD-ROM containing audio-video recordings of Dr. Fischel giving an ETS surgery consultation, then deceptively claimed it had been lost. I relied upon this deception, and I was harmed by it.
Count 6 Fraud
Steve Glickman intentionally destroyed signed declarations of 3 other Fischel patients. This was done to protect the interest of Dr. Fischel. I relied on this deception, and I was harmed by it.
Relief
My case against Dr. Fischel was winnable. Dr. Fischel claimed to have warned me of 6 side effects. But Dr. Fischel's own website, and his CD-ROM video, and his prior sworn testimony, and his other patients, and my consultation notes, and his own consultation notes, and his own letter to me all support my position that he only warned me of 2 side effects. There is not a jury in the world that would have believed Dr. Fischel, if only they would have seen the evidence. Any attorney would know this. Any honest attorney would have been anxious to prosecute my case to the fullest.
Instead, Steve Glickman removed my neuro-psychiatrist expert, concealed my injuries from the court, dismissed my loss of earnings claim without opposition, dismissed my punitive damages claim without opposition, lied to me about an utterly fictitious statute of limitations, failed to request a key medical record, repeatedly threatened to quit as my attorney, failed to depose any defense experts, and ultimately insisted that I dismiss my case altogether.
Considering loss of earnings, my injuries, my pain and suffering, my damages are incalculable. My bizarre physical and mental disabilities continue to this day, and they are permanent. Your honor, I ask you to punish attorney Steve Glickman by finding him liable for fraud, and awarding monetary damages that you see fit.
Dated this 29th day of April
0 comments