For the last three years I've been reading Stephen Barret MD reports he does in his Casewatch.org and Quackwatch.org. To my astonishment, I read his misleading reports about the practice of several hundred of alternative and complementary medicine doctors, when he does not have the knowledge to judge them, much less to write a report. How can a person in his right mind talk and post in the internet about something he has no idea about?
Stephen Barret, MD, is a retired or de-licensed psychiatrist, who believes he has the right to write about what he think are the practices of those hundred of alternative and complementary doctors, when he is not instructed about any of those practices. He shows no knowledge on that important subject, and he twist, in many cases, reports given by government agencies, like accusations from Medical Boards, make them appear like wrong doings of those doctors, just because an angry relative of a patient filed a complain to a doctor, when the patient was not happy or the therapy did not fulfilled his/her expectations.
0 comments