I hired a Mercedes C250 from Sixt Ft Lauderdale, FL on April 13. I hired vehicles solely and frequently from Sixt only at that area and am at their leading Jewelry level. I talked using the supervisor after selecting the vehicle as much as clarify the vehicle appeared very slow, particularly when increasing from stand-still at traffic lights. Additionally a lighting about the dash might periodically display STORE. They didn't possess a equivalent or greater vehicle to switch and so I held the vehicle since I have wasn’t operating often also it simply lay in my own storage. Time for Sixt, April 30th the vehicle delayed in a traffic-light and wouldn't begin again. It'd to become towed into Sixt. I discussed that I had been really annoyed because anything was wrong using the vehicle after I selected it-up, and of course the truth that my security was possibly in danger. Over 8 weeks later I get a notice challenging over $11K in problems from the 3rd party promises company without any preceding conversation from Sixt. I originally believed it was a fraud. Sixt promises that water was within the fuel-tank which I'm responsible for ensuing problems. Our efforts to speak with Sixt went unanswered till I had been ultimately directed to speak immediately using the promises organization. I have mentioned this with my lawyer and plan to claim this state in courtroom displaying: -Inconsistent recorded enrollment figures and usage for that vehicle under consideration evaluating my rental bills to Sixt corporate payment claims and also the damage estimation. Additionally, the vehicle was towed to Sixt on 4/30 but wasn't examined for harm until 6/4. -Certification of a large number of comparable customer grievances against Sixt for dubious business methods, deceptive and/or inflated injury states, credit payment mistakes, and an “F” score from the Better Business Office. -Certification of comparable physical failure reviews online for that produce, year and type of the vehicle under consideration. -Sixt proceeded straight to a 3rd party promises company without telling me of any harm challenge, along with waiting 2 weeks following the reality. CREDIT suggested in my experience that any state should be questioned within thirty days. Sadly the old saying "you receive that which you purchase" holds true. And when it is also inexpensive there's an issue. Stay with more trustworthy auto rental companies and save your self lots of heartaches.
0 comments