1. Direct TV declined to hold Television support after I created this demand by telephone. They stated my present statement needed to be compensated. The present bill wasn't late. I've been a person for quite some time, have usually compensated my expenses, haven't had a payment issue.
2. Direct TV declined to hold my Television support after I created the demand another period by means of a written notice. I settled the present statement by its deadline. I surrounded an email to hold the support. Centered on what Direct TV had explained - the statement needed to be compensated after which they'd hold support.
3. Direct TV charged me a regular cost after I'd stopped support twice - by telephone and by written notice. Appears there's no conversation between your payment division that obtained my published notice and the division that suspends service; and, consequently, I should purchase per month of service after I'd twice required suspension of this service.
4. Direct TV declined to hold my Television support after I created the demand a third-time, by telephone. Direct TV mentioned the the costs charged me for that month after I'd twice required suspension of service, by telephone and by written notice, needed to be compensated first before they'd hold service.
The corporation is crazy. Direct Television is cheating the general public with composed charges, which makes it hard to hold support to allow them to gather additional charges. This cheating organization shouldn't be permitted to run in virtually any region where there's no rival. Their permit ought to be stopped in most places where they've no opposition.
0 comments