I'm extremely dissatisfied in Hair Blitzer’s protection of the overall who had been “effectively fired” from his article in Afghanistan. Though I discover that I buy into the general’s views, I've the next issues with the reporting of these: First, Blitzer is meant to become confirming the news headlines not spritzing it together with his personal viewpoint. Next, doesn’t he understand what the law states? Generals aren't designed to convey political views and plan. That's for another department of the federal government, a handling stage not described. Next, doesn’t he understand his National background? Does the Truman/General MacArthur conflict sound familiar? Please inform Wolf Blitzer to record the news headlines and maintain herself from it.
0 comments