I will not go into details about my case, nor will anything said here be fully accurate to the truth, as the truth is based solely on speculation of unique yet commonly seen patterns to activities related as such.
Brief history: I had a very strong cased of Fair Credit Reporting Act violations and fraudulent activities by a bank I had a loan with. Needless to say, Ive provided details of my case to several attorneys, and have witness their eyes open wide and blood flush through in face with excitement.
Agreement: The case was a pay if you win scenario. The terms of the fraud charges would be established at the conclusion of one year post processing of tasks and services against the defendant. I was to be kept updated on the status.
Results: Until I vigorously (once a week) sent a profession and short email, I had not received any response from either M. Weisberg or B. Coco. After vigorous inquiring of a statement, I received an email; conclusion of representation (they dropped my case).
Conclusion: Based on the nature of what had transpired, and how it came to pass, I have firm reason to believe this firm accepted a bribe from the defendant, leaving me both empty handed while still ongoing with malice conduct being done to my good name. While I could go into details about the RICO Act, and how Weisberg, PC could be seen as co inspirers of fraud provided any of this were to be true, this is after all mere speculation. What I will say from a factual stand point is, I dont have much to flag them as a horrible firm, but I dont have anything to show for them being a good firm either. So be careful.
0 comments