Usacomplaints.com » Lawyers & Legal Counseling » Complaint / Review: Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher, P.C - Jeanne V. Barron attorney for Shiawassee Condo Assoc.in Southfield, MI. #816868

Complaint / Review
Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher, P.C
Jeanne V. Barron attorney for Shiawassee Condo Assoc.in Southfield, MI

There are several top quality attorneys in south Michigan, Ezra D. Goldman, Anthony Della Pelle and Jennifer Cordon Thor simply to label several. Jeanne V. Barron (P37138) of Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher, P.C. Isn't one of these.

Plaintiff, Ms. “X” on 02/12/08 sustained a and drop incident about the Shiawassee Residence Association home at 7:10am. It was twelve months precisely following the 02/12/07 communication (posted by Lawyer Ezra D. Goldman and times following the 01/21/08 communication posted by Lawyer Jennifer Cordon Thor.

Offender, Shiawassee Residence Association and its own preservation team of two John (Frank) Piech and Thomas Blanding were defendants in the earlier lawsuit 067809-NZ (public file info). Both were prosecuted by identical plaintiff (Case No. GC 09 1653) within the Mi 46th District Court. The preservation team of two, John Bob Piech and Thomas Blanding seemed on defendant’s initial lay and expert watch record provided by you their lawyer Jeanne Barron. None of the panel people were outlined JUST Piech and Blanding who're significantly illiterate, only preservation and were prosecuted by this same plaintiff in a prior lawsuit-067809-NZ within the Oakland County Circuit Court. She (Barron) understood this.

Offender, Shiawassee Residence Association (Southfield, MI) through its lawyer, Jeanne Barron refused that it breached some of its responsibilities and more declines that it had been irresponsible but states it had been led by, and totally noticed all its authorized responsibilities and responsibilities required by procedure of regulation, the condo bylaws and normally, for the reason that all the steps of its brokers, servants, and/or workers were cautious, correct, wise and authorized... It required correct motion to manage and impose its grasp actions and bylaws but a ideal preservation was required 12/17. The demand was declined 12/24 “these products are co-operator obligation the affiliation will require no motion in it clear snow. None [snow] offered at this time”. What about that “None [snow] offered at this time”. Offender, Shiawassee Residence Association on 12/24 “in writing” declined to recognize its legal responsibility mentioned within the condo files, Article V, Part 5 and also the Michigan legislation sculpture MCL 559.153. Offender (Shiawassee) on 12/24 declined to recognize its fiduciary obligation that it [opposition] allows in its Spring 2005 publication. While offender (Shiawassee Residence Association) isn't surer of security, it's a to exercise DUE TREATMENT, Roberts v Stevens Business, Inc. (1999) wl 334455020. Offender (Shiawassee) on 12/24 “in writing” declined to exercise DUE TREATMENT.

Delay! Delay! The very best is yet in the future. Barron, in her launch (01/07/10 Summary Temperament, site 2) claims (plaintiff) wasn't different to defendant”. Offender and Barron also weren't different to plaintiff; all performed component in a prior lawsuit, Case No. 067809-nz. She understood this.

The January 07 Summary Temperament, site 2 based on Jeanne Barron claims “ plaintiff Ms. “X” claims that, on September 18, she tucked and dropped on accumulated snow on the pavement within the condo complex. (View Plaintiff’s Criticism, sentences 17 and 18)” The summary disposition mentioned incorrect data. Plaintiff, Ms. “X” didn't slide and drop on accumulated snow about the pavement within the condo complex on September 18; this isn't mentioned within the criticism, section 17 and 18. What about that!!! An attorney - Inefficient, Inexperienced and Obtuse.

Offender, Shiawassee Residence Association (Southfield, MI) in its (Spring 2009) publication states homeowners should bring residence insurance; this isn't mentioned within the bylaws. Offender (Shiawassee) should bring insurance. This really is mentioned within the bylaws, Article IV. Conformity of the bylaw judgment, Article IV is required by Michigan legislation sculpture MCL 559.153. Offender should (may) maintain comprehensive publications/documents; this really is mentioned within the bylaws, Post 1, Part 3. Conformity of the bylaw judgment Post 1, Part 3 is required by Michigan legislation sculptures MCL 559.153 and MCL 559.154 (1). Notice of meetings should (may) be submitted to co-homeowners by email. This can be a bylaw judgment, Post 1 (y). Conformity of the bylaw judgment, Post 1 (y) is required by Michigan legislation sculpture MCL 559.153. “The [condominium association] bylaws don't supersede or conquer regulations of Michigan”.

Barron today swollen claims this (all above) is hurting her status. Chuckle. Go right ahead and laugh. Chuckle. Laugh, Chuckle. That’s just too bad.independence of Talk is guarded from the First Amendment towards the U.S. Structure and also the Structure of Mi 1963, Part 5; Barron possibly doesn't understand this. Why actually might Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher, P.C. (Farmington Hills, MI) utilize this lawyer Jeanne Barron? Why could any lawyer Mich or elsewhere utilize this lawyer, Jeanne Barron?


Offender: Raftery, Janeczek & Hoelscher, P.C

Country: USA   State: Michigan   City: Farmington Hills
Site:

Category: Lawyers & Legal Counseling

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google