Judge Leslie C. Nichols of the Santa Clara County Superior Court in San Jose, California, presided over a medical negligence test against a health care provider who did the incorrect surgery on me. This physician, who's board-certified and shows at Stanford, not just run about the incorrect knee, but he managed on greater than a dozen of the incorrect areas of my body. He managed on both legs for no cause and without my permission, and today my previously ideal legs trigger me continuous discomfort, as my kneecaps are dislocating. I can't kneel down whatsoever anymore. This doctor created big Xis 8 9" long in my own sides, anything no physician, including his expert experience, might clarify. There have been stitches in my own pubic region, again for no cause and without my permission. It was a lot more like a rape than a surgical procedure - he broke my body after I was spontaneous and not able to protect myself.
The very first area of the test was to look for the credibility of the launch I closed - a launch that was authorized before all of the harm was actually recognized to me (my body was swollen in the surgery and also the harm wasn't obvious). This discharge must have been trashed since all of the proof offered confirmed that used to do not and may not need recognized the harm this physician did in my experience at that time that I closed it, and there is no waiver of Civil Code 1542, which claims that you simply can't renounce your to prosecute over issues that you don't learn about. There have been pictures of my body at that time I closed the release, after which pictures taken many months to greater than a year later, plus they were completely different - the harm didn't seem until weeks after signing the release. The physician offered no proof that I did so understand of the harm after I closed the launch - actually he refused that there is any harm whatsoever.
Judge Nichols noticed the physician's own documents which demonstrated he managed about the incorrect knee and the rest of the components. He noticed the large pit in my own right knee where the physician had run for no cause and without permission. He noticed the Xis created into my sides. He noticed the pictures of harm to my legs, calves and many other areas. The physician's attorney didn't oppose some of this, and offered no positive proof why the doctor must have run on each one of these incorrect components. These were practically quiet, except to provide a cover declaration questioning my accusations. The physician herself in his sworn declaration didnot actually refuse having accomplished something wrong, he simply stated, "I didnot believe I did something wrong".
I gave a comprehensive consideration of discussions using the physician where originally he refused having run about the incorrect leg, when confronted by the evidence in their own documents he had, then he composed a tale why he did not work on the best leg. There have been a lot more lies over a period of time of weeks, I offered proof the physician changed the medical documents, and lied in my experience written down. None of the was refuted from the physician - these were quiet.
Therefore at the conclusion of the test, I had been particular I'd gained - it had been therefore one sided it had been absurd. I had been surprised after I got Judge Nichols' judgment against me - and not just did he tip against me and support the launch, he was really aggressive in my experience, as though I were the main one who'd accomplished something amiss. He didn't mention one-word concerning the physician running about the incorrect components, changing the medical documents, lying in my experience. No, what stood out in Judge Nichols' brain was that I known the physician by his lastname in the place of contacting him Dr. %, and he chastised me for this. Therefore Nichols believes that my absence of the most regard for this guy that has mutilated me is worse compared to mutilation itself???!!! He actually stated in his judgment he did not believe the physician did something wrong.
Nichols, oh, pardon me, JUDGE Nichols requested me to pay for the physician's lawyer's costs, and that I have since needed to undergo bankruptcy as a result of this. He requested me to get rid of all articles on the web by what the physician did in my experience, and that I am banned from speaking with anybody by what he did. (I will and do article by what this physician has been doing to others).
I had been extremely dubious of the judgeis ruling, therefore I searched him on the web, and lo and see, he and the physician would be the same-age, they both visited Stanford, and they've existed and/or worked near to one another for many years.
There's more - a couple of days prior to the test, Judge Nichols had a meeting using the two attorneys, plus they all determined that there could be no court, no witnesses could be named and there could be no account (gee, who this advantage? Our internist would state, as was an other woman who likewise had the incorrect components done and broken from the same physician. These were not really likely to permit my account, but I insisted, and following a dialogue between my attorney and also the judge, he eventually relented.) Our attorney never explained concerning the assembly, so when the test began with no court I named him apart and questioned that which was happening. He explained that for that first area of the test used to donot possess a selection of a court. After which whenever we returned to courtroom he informed the judge I'd misunderstood him. But Nichols settled little interest, despite the fact that the trial had only started moments before, and we continued using the bench test. It was not before entire point was around and that I got Nichols' sensitive judgment against me, also it stated, "she readily and intelligently waived her to a court test" that I recognized that my attorney had completed this behind my back (possibly to prevent spending court costs and also to obtain the entire point around with rapidly). I wrote to Evaluate Nichols informing him of my attorneyis fraud, and advised him that the moment the test began with no court, I named my lawyer apart. But Nichols dismissed my notice and created the ultimate judgment against me.in his judgment he mocked me for "attempting to inform her tale".
And So I had told the judge that I never waived my to a court trial, my attorney informed the judge used to donot recognize I had been waiving my to a court trial (he was laying, he did it without actually visiting me), therefore where on the planet is Judge Nichols obtaining this proof that I readily and intelligently waived my to a court trial? From nothing? And precisely what was stated at that pre trial assembly to obtain my attorney togo from fighting for justice to promoting me out?
And that's not all that occurred - I recognized in regards to a year following the test that there is a loophole within the judgeis ruling, and after consulting with many attorneys to ensure I had been in my privileges to do this, I published on the web about how exactly the physician had gotten a restraining order against me by laying under promise, stating that I confronted his workers. He completely created this tale, and finally the restraining order was overturned on constitutional reasons from the First Amendment Task in Oakland. Nevertheless when I published about that, the physician submitted a contempt of courtroom movement against me, and Judge Nichols confronted to toss me in state prison for 5 times easily didn't take away the article. I used my last of my income battling this, but my new attorney stated it'd charge $15K or even more to carry on the battle, and that I eventually needed to take away the article. Judge Nichols broke my privileges to free-speech to safeguard this physician. Why? Can it's they're buddies? Does that clarify his judgment against me within the medical negligence situation, unlike all of the proof?
It appears to me that possibly Decide Nichols can't understand basic ideas (like whenever a physician is meant to use about the remaining knee, but he works about the correct leg and damages it, then your physician has been doing something amiss), by which situation he's inexperienced; or he's damaged, and that I believe it's the latter.
I've previously had 10 procedures to try and repair the physician's errors, and that I am not really near to being complete again. I've continuous pain in my own legs, I've dropped down-stairs 4 occasions, and that I cannot rest due to the discomfort. I dropped my company since I've been so frustrated, I will just function part-time today, and that I invest all my time looking to get enough cash to determine more physicians and also have more surgery. I'm just one mom, and my child and that I have now been evicted from two flats since this devastating surgery since I really couldnot spend the lease. No body knows if my legs or other areas may actually be set. I've synthetic calves today to complete the concave places created when this moronic physician run on my previously ideal calves for no cause. I still possess the remnants of Xis on my sides. None of the surgery is included in insurance since it is recognized as fresh - no physician I've visited has actually observed harm like what this physician did in my experience. Due to Nichols' judgment, I'll never be paid for my accidents, and that I am scared of what'll occur to me as time goes on, and whether I'll have the ability to purchase the operations I still require. You can't imagine the terror of getting areas of the body eliminated and run on against your will, after which likely to the machine searching for justice but rather getting raped once again. I've cried buckets of holes.
When there is any actual justice nowadays, there's a unique devote hell reserved for both of these.
0 comments