I'm looking for an attorney to represent me, as my main website and blog were ordered removed by the Arapahoe (Colorado) district court.
Dr. Tameira Hollander sued me because I had posted a LINK to John Bailey's website. He is the husband of her former patient Barbara Bailey and he claimed that Dr. Hollander almost killed his wife. To support his allegation, he had a number of webpages with extremely detailed information and documentation.
Mr. Bailey's website was so convincing, I posted the LINK at my site with my comment:
A great site and fantastic example of how everybody should DOCUMENT and PUBLICIZE their complaints!
The Baileys immediately deleted their website when they were served, but I refused to remove all references to Dr. Hollander. Dr. Hollander is apparently NOT capable of typing her own email address correctly and despite my requests for SPECIFIC allegedly libelous statements, she submitted none.
The allegations against me are entirely fabricated and despite my request for comments to Dr. Tameira Hollander's attorneys and my repeated requests to provide ANY documentation to substantiate their allegations, I have received NOTHING.
They are monitoring my NEW blog about the litigation and to date they have NOT submitted notice of any incorrect statement. Everything at my blog is ACCURATE.
I am posting all communications with Dr. Hollander's attorneys, Irving Johnson and Lauren E. Dorweiler with Pryor Johnson Carney Karr Nixon, P.C.in Greenwood Village, CO at the new litigation blog.
They agreed to stipulate to extend my time to respond to the complaint to 2/12/09 and I hope to find an attorney not only to get the TRO vacated, but to LITIGATE the ISSUES:
1) Dr. Tameira Hollander's PERJURY (she verified the FALSE allegations in the complaint under oath)
2) Their process server / Peeping Tom's trespassing on my property and TERRORIZING me. I decided to arm and defend myself against future intruders, but I still have nightmares and I'll probably have to move or spend at least $20,000 on security.
3) While I'm aware of the lawyers' "privilege" to lie (the litigation privilege), I sure would like to see some repercussions against attorney Irving Johnson for filing this harassment complaint, KNOWING that the allegations against me were false.
He wrote to me prior to serving me that he wanted me to remove Tameira Hollander's name from my sites. Posting someone's NAME is NOT libel and neither are my TRUE statements.
Essentially, he conspired with Dr. Hollander to attempt to threaten, harass and abuse me until I agree to rewrite history and delete all references to Dr. Hollander from my sites. Naming me in this lawsuit is pure malicious prosecution.
4) I also find it suspicious that the judge ordered the removal of my site without ANY evidence whatsoever.
If this judge did nothing wrong, the usacomplaints.com site could be ordered removed too. I think there's at minimum the appearance of impropriety and I wouldn't be surprised at all if the lawyer and the judge are friends.
If they aren't friends, WHY did the judge order my blog removed without any evidence of defamatory statements?
This order doesn't pass the smell test and I think they expected me to cave in after being served like the Baileys.
Of course their strategy backfired, as you will notice if you search the web for "Tameira Hollander."
If you want to send a message to judges, lawyers, doctors, scammers and incompetent professionals of all sorts, PLEASE link to this usacomplaints.com from your sites and repost it at other free speech and complaint sites.
I want to make this THE free speech case.
Christine
Kingman, Arizona
U.S.A.
0 comments