The Erotic Review has a long history of favoritism and mistreatment.
I questioned a review I was given. I felt it was too explicit. I was banned. When I asked why I was banned, I was told it was because I self-reviewed. I asked them what the heck they were talking about. They could not come up with the reviews, stating they were "unpublished." Huh? They could not come up with the IP addresses of the reviewers. All very odd. And, very coincidental that this happened right after I respectfully requested that they amend one of my reviews, because I felt it was incriminating. I like to be discreet.
After a lengthy investigation, I found out that The Erotic Review refuses to publish any review that isn't "racy" enough.in my opinion, this leads to over-imaginative, exaggerated, and inaccuarte reviews. I always recieved the top scores on the site. I had no reason to self-review. They lied to cover the fact that they don't like anyone questioning their business practices.
In talking to many hobbyists and providers, I discovered that many reviews are not published, because they are too discreet. Men should be allowed to be discreet, if that is their desire. I also learned that any girl who dared to question their authority was instantly banned.
I further investigated to find that many girls were banned and told they would be allowed back on, if they provided sexual services to the owner of the site.
Considering that TER is a very fruitful venue for providers, it's no wonder many of the girls chose to take him up on his offer and give him sex, in exchange for being allowed back on.
This is extortion! It is sexual harrassment!
Boycott the erotic review!
0 comments