Usacomplaints.com » Cars & Transport » Complaint / Review: Marshall Engines Inc - Junk engine. #525062

Complaint / Review
Marshall Engines Inc
Junk engine

I'd bought a vehicle motor that had A30 month 50,000 mile guarantee, upon getting the motor and having it mounted with a licensed GM technician the motor didn't operate properly. The motor was difficult to begin, burnt gas, and might continue operating after being turn off. I approached Marshall Motors and also the positioned the fault about the carburetor. Once the technician mounted the motor he explained there is no proof of the motor actually being dyno tested the color wasn't actually stained within the exhaust ports. I had been informed by Paul at Marshall Motors (6-15-09) they dyno utilizing gas and never gasoline with this particular type of motor which in my own comprehension you will find variations in motors that work gas in the place of fuel. The Mount Technician explained that even when they did utilize gas there must be discoloration because of warmth which there is not. After I spoke to Drew (6-15-09) she was ignorant they check utilizing gas and mentioned there are various components on gas engines than gas engines. The motor employed roughly 1 quart of fat for each 30 gallons of gasoline. After roughly 11 weeks and 3800 kilometers the motor blew up. Marshall Motors decided to spend exactly the same mechanic to rip the motor along and identify it (they've yet to pay for the technician). He discovered a bit of the piston was absent, the top was damaged, & the top gasket was taken. The lost piece of the piston was no-where found, the technician contacted 2 additional GM Certified Technicians concerning the missing item. Once the additional technicians combined with the unique technician did a deeper examination they figured the item was possibly never there as there have been no scars within the motor in the item being eliminated through the exhaust ports. The figured the lost item might clarify the surplus gas reduction, hard begins, overheating of the tube, and operating on that had happened because the motor was mounted. They recommended the technician to get rid of the motor and deliver it back again to them for inspection-which he did. They explained they'd contain it examined and also have a solution for me personally in 7 - 10 times. They obtained the motor on 5-22-09 after many calls for them they explained these were not likely to recognize the guarantee on 6-13-09 (22 times once they obtained it) and mentioned it was anything I did so that triggered the motor to crash.


Offender: Marshall Engines Inc

Country: USA
Site:

Category: Cars & Transport

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google