Among Geicois client struck an automobile behind me within the right-side of her vehicle and rearended me. The client was positioned for wreckless driving and had hardly any harm to his vehicle. About the other hand my vehicle was ruined as was the womanis which was behind me. Geico really wants to place both cars on a single state and divided the state between heris and my vehicles. I'm not wealthy, nor have the money to get a new vehicle. I still had 4 decades to pay for about the one he destroyed. Another woman is within the same form. Today I'm needing to declare the damage on my insurance and employ an attorney. Geico must invest only a little less cash on the advertisements and much more on the ethical obligation.
0 comments