I'd prefer to article the incompetency of the team that managed my incident statement last Nov. 6... I have have demand on a single day to get a comprehensive analysis which dimensions should be obtained with both vehicles therefore to discover when the problems about the additional vehicle arranged using the dimension of the purpose of contact on my rear driver-side bumper since i realized i didn't strike another vehicle whois creating a deceptive state... I called Geico re: this issue and discovered that centered on Dennis Mc Mullen summary that I did so hit another car, the harm about the additional car driver-side steel fender particularly the reduction aimed using the dimension of my rear plastic bumperis height., that there is color chipping about the additional car that was brought on by my car, that there is no indication of rusting about the harm region... I required for the images to be delivered to me whilst the individual i spoke to can't fully described how such summary was created... Upon getting the images I then found out that number dimension was obtained by Daniel Walsh who after I named him, he explained that there is no such coaching for him to consider dimension of the clients vehicle problems despite of my demand that was in my own apply for Geico to do this and that was vouched by Geico consultant that they can do. Additionally what i dont know how such very necessary information for example dimensions be overlooked particularly after I have wanted it... For a comprehensive analysis to become achieve every position of proof ought to be taken into account and scrutinized specifically for delicate situations like mine. Since no dimension of another vehicle was done. I hereby discover the examining team managing my situation brought by Dennis Mc Mullen for incompetency, elegance in-coming up having a summary for that following cause:
1. Just how can Dennis Mc Mullen determine the harm particularly the reduction aimed with my caris bumper point-of contact peak if no dimension was obtained about the broken car?
2. Just how can this type of steel fender heavy reduction whose middle/greatest area of the reduction is nearly 3" greater (26" when I required dimension myself) be developed by my vehicleis lower peak (23") flat-surfaced plastic bumper shifting at significantly less than 1mile each hour...
3. Just how can Dennis Mc Mullen skipped the hallmark of previous rusting that was apparent within the images that I have delivered Geico and just how come people who did get images didnt actually stated that there is certainly indication of rustings about the cracked color of the harm.
4. Just how can Dennis Mc Mullen have overlooked that there's not really any indication of color move about the point-of contact on my driver-side plastic bumper easily truly struck and triggered the chipping injury about the different vehicle.
5 how can he have overlooked that there is neither breaks, reduction, scores on my driveris aspect rear bumper point-of contact if it certainly had triggered dent and chipping about the different vehicle.
You see all the above facts have now been overlooked or didn't be recognized by GEICO examining group particularly of Dennis Mc Mullen who've created such incorrect, partial and unfactual summary which have triggered me to become incriminated in the place of being guarded from deceptive state of the blaming party.
I spoke to some particular BILL KUREK within the statements division and he explained that they'll not alter the final outcome which no reinvestigation is likely to be more created despite of the disappointment to complete a comprehensive analysis by ignoring to consider required dimensions of both vehicle. GEICO refused of my right to get a reasonable and comprehensive analysis.
0 comments