Yes, John F. Temrowski is at it again. He has filed another suit, Macomb County 004154-NZ.By this time next week, only God knows how many people will have pending lawsuits against them. It is in my OPINION that he did not like the results that he was getting from his other suits. Plus, he undoubtedly wasn't happy with Judge Switalski's decision that he could not deposition my wife to actually be a witness against me, based on a motion that was filed. So he has done what appears to be the next best thing, sue her. What better way to compel someone to give a deposition under the circumstances?
He believes, now yet another defendant has defamed his name and character. Oddly enough though, in his recent response that to the Attorney Grievance Commission, he admits the fact that he believes one person and one person ONLY to have been the author of any and all defamatory statements made against him yet he chooses to sue multiple defendants. Okay, then why attempt to sue someone when you have admitted YOURSELF that you do not believe them to be the author?
I can give you my opinion on that one. That's just JOHN TEMROWSKI!!! This man, I suspect, has contacted so many people, and made so many promises that it has prompted at least a few of his so called 'witnesses' to tell him to buzz off. One witness even told me that he felt his feelings were hurt by how they felt about him. Yes, Mr. Temrowski, your feelings will get hurt when you drag people into little rooms and force them to state facts for you to be vindictive and vengeful towards them and people they care about. Do you expect them to thank you??? It took a while but people are beginning to believe what I have said about this man.
As everyone can see, I am still giving my daily journal on the daily tasks of Mr. John Temrowski so it appears that my FREEDOM OF FREE SPEECH has not been revoked quite yet. If anyone has considered hiring this man, you should do your research on how many HOURS and POUNDS of papers this attorney has invested in just three cases that only seek to benefit himself and no one else. If you've ever dealt with an attorney before, you know that most are hard enough to get a hold of. I can only imagine how much time this man would have for a new client.
I wish I could post the statement that this man has claimed to be defamatory in case 12-4154-NZ. I'm not quite sure what part of it is any way not true. I read the complaint and every precise item is true as I was there. I question whether this man even KNOWS what DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER is; particularly by his last complaint.in my opinion, this one is a real laugh-er.
I'll be back MONDAY!!!
0 comments