Usacomplaints.com » Miscellaneous » Complaint / Review: Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques - Edmundo Espinoza, Law Offices of Edmundo Espinoza, Edmundo Bojorques, Espinoza-Bojorques, Edmundo Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques is a Crooked Lawyer, a Fraud and a Cheat. #762694

Complaint / Review
Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques
Edmundo Espinoza, Law Offices of Edmundo Espinoza, Edmundo Bojorques, Espinoza-Bojorques, Edmundo Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques is a Crooked Lawyer, a Fraud and a Cheat

Prior to the disciplinary panel of their state bar of florida. Connection to agreement of details, findings of regulation and temperament within the issue of: rudy hooper vs. Edmundo espinoza bojorquez situation quantity (s): 05-0-02996. FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: Participant, Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques, with tackle at 5139 Quail Lake Travel, Dallas, Texas. 75287. Tel. 214-475-3015, admits the following truth is accurate and he is responsible of violations of the required laws and/or Guidelines of Professional Conduct: 1.in January Participant

Was utilized by Rudy Hooper ("Hooper) to signify him in a legal issue while Hooper was imprisoned. At that time of work, Hoopers dad offered Participant $37,000. These resources were to become employed for both Participants authorized costs as well as for potential costs that Participant was to pay for with respect to Hooper per "pay purchases" that Hooper might distribute to Participant. The events didn't come right into a published payment contract. 2. On January 29, Participant settled herself $5,000 as his legal costs and transferred the rest of the $32,000 of the $37,000 settled by Hoopers dad right into a money-market account, account number 09858-03231 at Bank of America (the "money-market account). 3.in

January Participant settled herself one more $6,000 in appropriate costs in the money-market account. The total amount within the money-market account turned $26,000.4.in March Participant

Moved $22,000 in the money-market account to some common account, account number 0958-09990 at Bank of America (the "common account"). Participant withdrew the rest of the $4,000 within the money-market consideration as his costs. 4.in March Respondent released an overall total of $1,300 in cash requests to numerous people per pay requests posted by Hooper in the common consideration. 5.in March Participant paid $2000 in expenses with respect to Hooper and settled herself $4000 in appropriate costs in the common consideration. The total amount within the common consideration turned $14,700.6. Between March

2004 and June Participant paid $11,953 in costs per "pay purchases" posted by Hooper. Participant settled these costs by first electronically shifting resources in the common account to a different common account, account number 10395-14334 at Bank of America (the "minute

Common account"). Participant subsequently released assessments in the Connection Page-1 minute common consideration to pay for the $11,953 in costs. Participant settled the rest of the $2,747, which was still within the common consideration to herself in appropriate costs. AUTHORIZED SUMMARY: By declining to deposit the first $37,000 in a customer

Confidence account and by eventually adding the rest of the customer resources within the money-market account, the overall account and also the next common account, Participant didn't deposit customer resources in a trust account. PENDING ACTIONS: The disclosure day known, on page-one, section A. (7), was by notice dated July 12. Specialists promoting control: vaughn v. State Bar (1972) 6 Cal. 3d 847: The lawyer obtained a Community reproval for misconduct that involved repeatedly permitting his customer trust consideration to drop below the minimum stability he was necessary to preserve inside it. Fitzsimmons v. State Bar (1983) 34 Cal. 3d 327: The lawyer was discovered to become grossly irresponsible in handling property resources by declining to keep appropriate documents. The court-imposed a Public Reproval. Participant was irresponsible in handling customer resources by adding such resources in numerous bank accounts which were not customer trust records. STRESS: Respondent managed customer resources in a number of bank accounts which were not customer trust records. ADDITIONAL PROBLEMS DISCUSSED BY THE FUNCTIONS: Within eighteen (18) weeks of the effective time of control, Participant will supply evidence of work of Their State

Club Customer Trust Accounting College towards the Workplace of Probation of the State Bar. To Find Out More on Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques visit: http://www.calbar.ca. Gov/House. Aspx


Offender: Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques

Country: USA   State: Texas   City: Dallas
Address: 5139 Quail Lake DriveDallas, Texas. 75287
Phone: 2144753015

Category: Miscellaneous

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google