Diane Van Ness' rebuttal is nothing short of shocking.
Diane Van Ness is NOT a pro bono guardian ad litem! She is yet again attempting to hide her endless extortion which leaves families homeless. Pay her over 100% of your salary or you don't see your children! That's extortion and against all Florida GAL statutes.
Diane does not state in her rebuttal that she has not practiced (commercial litigation) in many years. She was thrown out of that arena after destroying her own reputation. She works out of her home a few hours a week, for only half the year, and only on GAL cases.
Diane does not state in her rebuttal that the supposed "Award" she "won" was given by the very university where she teaches, so she was able to nominate herself via her friends and contacts in order to make herself look good. This was an objective award bestowed upon her by those who know her antics.
Diane does not state in her rebuttal that she refuses to leave a case for years at a time, refuses any and all contact with the parent, engages in late night screaming phone calls and nasty hand-written letters demanding money, and will not let a parent see his or her own children until she is paid in full, even when she is on vacation much of the year.
Diane does not state in her rebuttal that she fabricates her own quotes and paraphrases by professionals, filing in a court of law that these doctors stated claims against these parents, when in fact, they all insist they never said any such thing.
Diane does not state in her rebuttal that she files everything as non-evidentiary so that nobody can refute anything she does, and so that the judges never find out what she is doing financially.
Diane does not state in her rebuttal that if you dare file anything as an eivdentiary hearing so that the truth be known, she stops all parental contact with the children, which is so painful that the parent finally must give in. She simultaneously threatens the attorneys and doctors with their own practices and reputations so that they, too, decide to stay low key.
As with most people with her tragic disorder, Diane presents here as the "spokesperson" for how things should be done well. Does that ring a bell? This is yet another symptom of her psychosis, in my opinion as well as that of many, many people.
Her mask should not be allowed to stay on forever. Thankfully, there is freedom of speech that allows websites like this to prevent further fraudulent activity.
0 comments