MR STAMP HAS A FULL HEARING WITH THE FCA AS HE HAS BEEN CAUGHT SELLING UNREGULATED PRODUCTS IN THE UK FROM HIS OFFICES IN PORTSMOUTH. ANY ONE WHO INVESTED IN THE IRISH BONDS AND TILL NOW HAVE NOT HAD THEIR MONIES BACK PLEASE CONTACT THE FCA.
SEE BELOW PEOPLE INVOLVED DIRECTLY IN THE ORGANISATION
HM Courts & Tribunals Service Guidance
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery) financial services hearings and register
Updated 1 September
Reference number Date received Applicant v Respondent Hearing type Hearing details Outcome
FS/013 9 Aug Iain Clifford Stamp v FCA Date/time: To be fixed
FS/012 9 Aug UK Innovative TI Limited v FCA Date/time: To be fixed
FS/011 4 Aug Stargate Capital Management Ltd / Stargate Corporate Finance Ltd v FCA Date/time: To be fixed
From: Gary Johnson
Subject: FX Perpetual Managed Account AUM
Cc: Iain Compton-Stamp, Paul Burrell
The AUM for FX Perpetual Ltd is £2.2 million Sterling and it would be best to speak with Iian
If you are available to speak to Iain please let me know and I can put this into Iain's diary.
Regards
Gary Johnson
Wealth Fortress AT
Office Number: 02392 217 250 Overseas callers: +44 23 9221 7250
According to the FCA, UKITI received the majority of an £800, 000 commission rebate, plus upfront fees of 5% from investors, a 25% performance fee and a 0.5% annual algorithmic rental fee.
The fund generated losses of around £185, 000 in January and £221, 000 in October however these losses were unrealised. In addition, the fund was marketed to potential investors using performance data based on realised trading profits and losses alone.
While there is little information available on the Momentum fund, also designed by UKITI, the FCA said it appears SCM provided a similar service to this small FX fund as it provided to FX Perpetual.
Behind UKITI is a man called Iain Stamp, who was formerly the chief executive of Integrity Financial Solutions. This company, which was established by Stamp in 1998, was censured by the Financial Services Authority in 2010. Because the firm was in liquidation at the time, the regulator waived a £350, 000 fine.
The regulator noted that the distribution of the fees suggests that UKITI is actually acting as the investment manager of the fund, not SCM. A review of 25% of client files also showed that none of the investors had received a suitability assessment.
0 comments