I agree with earlier writer's conclusions regarding this institution, although to be fair, it's hard to determine if complaints are valid. After a recent personal minor healthcare visit that escalated out of control, with multiple tests leading to other tests with questionable billing closely following, I am inclined to pay much closer attention to any such reports.
My disputes involve my original questions regarding the necessity of and the exact insurance paying decisions as to extra testing. Answers provided, as to my directive, by in-system doctor's personnel led to my decision in under-going further "urgent" tests. Answers which turned out to be innacurate, both as to options and insurance coverage.interestingly, after all tests and associated analyses, doctor concluded what I had suspected leading to first visit. Allergy symptoms (remember this spring?). Perfect bill of health, but substantially less financially solvent.
My advice is as stated in beginning. Either provide some way to later prove mistakes or misrepresentations regarding all information you receive, or better yet, go to a completely unaffiliated institution instead. The case above is exactly as transpired. My researched conclusions as to explanation behind these types of problems fall into the realm of opinion and will not be stated here. Disagreement is a certainty, but we must explore every possibility in order to protect current and potential future patients from the same.
0 comments