I got the Zahn evaluation and failed the November examination. He actually lay before the course stating “this is likely to be tested, this won’t be tested, etc”. There is definitely zero training or understanding happening for almost any people. It had been simply him betting at what might be examined - he obviously didn't take part in the publishing of the examination! After every program of the examination, I returned to my evaluation records to find out when the teacher was correct or not. Possibly 20% of exactly what the teacher stated might “definitely be tested” was really examined. From the substance he stated wouldn't be examined, 75% was really on my examination. Therefore, if you like to understand the substance move elsewhere for more reasonable evaluation components/info. If you like a fake feeling of confidence starting the examination, consider Zahn!
0 comments