Usacomplaints.com » Cars & Transport » Complaint / Review: Service Protection Direct - Denied claim. #460063

Complaint / Review
Service Protection Direct
Denied claim

I obtained a notice from Support Safety Direct which mentioned that my warranty have to be restored. Worried, I named the 800 # and talked towards the "supervisor" Mr Ron Roberts who requested me numerous concerns. First, he requested for that usage of my vehicle. Subsequently, if there have been any issues at that time and lastly, are there any lamps about the dash-board to point an issue. I guarantee him that there have been no issues with the vehicle with no sign lights on. He proceeded to inform me that with my vehicleis high-mileage I'd be prone to begin having LARGE issues! He assured me the only price I'd get was the $50 deductible, easily had an issue! The insurance was very expensive @ $153.00 monthly and so I thought assured that I had been creating a great choice. I survive a fixed-income, having a handicapped partner and teenager child with just one vehicle, I truly could not consider the opportunity of getting to locate $ to get a key fix

NICELY... I realized that it began leaking transmission gas the start of May and that I wouldn't generate it once I recognized that there is an issue. I named to discover the correct process of obtaining the vehicle looked over and created a scheduled appointment using the storage that's completed my preservation because the starting for that year, (gas, filters, etc.) He was sadly really hectic with two additional vehicles and may not get me in immediately. I had been funding neighbors vehicles and lastly chose to contact the Honda dealership and also have them repair it.in the end, the agreement mentioned that it had been lined. What Mr. Roberts overlooked to see me was the vehicle issue, (indication), must be divided to the stage of the split or problem WHICH was an expense they DIDN'T ADDRESS! Honda wouldn't use them because of their examination recommendations and called me to an Aamco seller. After much waiting and telephone calls backwards and forwards looking for out WHILE an inspector could be visiting consider the vehicle, he ultimately turned up 7 days in the period I'd TO INFORM AAMOCO TO dismantle the trans.in Feb. After I got out the protection there have been NO issues with my vehicle till it began leaking trans water in May. Therefore, why was I informed that my state was refused? And, why did the Aamco seller, not Support Safety Direct need to provide me the news headlines? Since they're only fraud artists with the correct solutions and consider your $ without any motives of offering you any support what-so actually! The inspector stated that it had been a pre existing situation. I guess that any damage might be mentioned like a pre existing situation simply to get free from their agreement! If my very own technician never observed an issue when he maintained my vehicle, then it had been not a thing really apparent or might be observed throughout a normal maintenance check-up! Until there is an issue that justified an additional look, there could be no cause TO APPEAR!!!


Offender: Service Protection Direct

Country: USA   State: Missouri   City: St. Louis

Category: Cars & Transport

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google