Usacomplaints.com » Animals & Birds » Complaint / Review: Petsmart grooming department - Injury to my dog. #516365

Complaint / Review
Petsmart grooming department
Injury to my dog

I created a scheduled appointment for my puppy for brushing. They explained none off the folks which have groomed her formerly will work there anymore. I described I needed one of the most skilled individual to look after her, she's been injured be considered a prior groomer. They set it-up using the grooming supervisor. Although I had been speaking with them I noticed your dog yelping many times but didn. T think something of it at that time. Later, after I returned to protest about my puppyis damage and informed him of the yelping I noticed after I was establishing the visit, the shop manger mentioned that occurs constantly. I've been utilizing the grooming department. For around 24 months and aside from the slice was only a little brief or she nevertheless appeared and smelled dirty after her grooming I never reported. The lady that got her in appeared her over then proceeded to up-sale me having a diverse type of wash. I said no. About 20 minutes later the supervisor named me mentioned she'd be focusing on Mitzi and again attempt to up-sell me. Again I said no, I told them I really could provide her wash for the reason that I'd bought at their shop she stated that wasn't permitted (I had been ready to get this done before). Four hours later she was completed. After I selected Mitzi up there is no body employed in the department. Aside from man that maintained her in my experience. I moved her out. I went nearby to go to my child I set Mitzi right down to stroll we observed she was limping. Our child mentioned perhaps they trimmed her toenails too brief. I chalked it-up to that particular. I'd chores to do this I simply maintained her everywhere with me. We got house hrs later I observed sje was limping really poorly. I named the groomer told them she was limpimg and questioned if something had occurred throughout the groom. They stated no the supervisor had completed the grooming but was not there at this time, of course if it endured provide her in plus they might have the Banfield Vet take a look at her. I purchased her in 2 hours later she appeared to be getting worse. I told the grooming supervisor she leaped down my neck "We did not do something wrong she was good once they had her and he or she was not the main one brushing her anyhow" she stated she'd talk to the shop manger. First she talked with him out within the parking lot and he arrived in looked over Mitzi stated he'd have Banfield examine her out I described I really could visit my vet it'd likely be cheaper. He described Petsmart could be accountable for the statement and he offered his trademark as agreement. Although I had been awaiting the vet the shop manager went into consult with the grooming supervisor. I really could hear her yelling obscenities and searching in my own path. She refused also brushing Mitzi. Although I had been waiting I begin experience Mitzi's paw I'd appeared all around the base of her foot, nothing. Then I experienced a large red swollen bundle on top of her foot (it ended up to be always a cyst0. I later discovered it may occur genetically or via an severe damage. They'd utilized a blade on her foot to slice the hair. They never use scissors usually a blade for anything. I named the supervisor back out and described there's no means they'd have overlooked this large bundle during cleaning her or particularly during shaving the hair along on her foot. They're careful with examining pets in, that there's nothing wrong they might be accountable for. Mitzi was not limping when she went in. The supervisor requested did not I discover once they strolled her out in my experience? I said they maintained her out in my experience. He explained they never do this for this such cause. He returned and talked using the man who examine her out. He explained, she'd been resting and he didnot wish to disrupt her with another grooming happening he didnot need her to obtain filthy again strolling through the hair on the ground. There was no grooming happening and also the ground had simply been taken totally after I was there. The vet said she'd a tumor and contamination she geve me medicine to provide to Mitzi for that next fourteen days she questioned basically needed a Rx on her continuous irritation I stated no, that I believed Petmart might just purchase present foot issue she mentioned it is okay they've authorized and decided to purchase this visit I mentioned okay and got the medication. I should have requested the vet 2-3 times if Petsmart would result in this statement, every time the vet said yes. Later I obtained a phone in the Vet declaring I owed $150 for that visit. I stated Petsmart guaranteed to cover it.

They're questioning their to blame. We returned and forth I described I never closed something stating I had been accountable. I went directly into keep in touch with the store-manager and that I described I'm certain you will find people available that will make use and comprehending that their puppy was injured try to blame it about the groomer, but I had been not just one of these individuals. I told him they've safeguards in position once they examine your dog in they analyzed her completely, while cleaning her or shaving the hair there's no means they'd have overlooked that large tumor on her foot. They understand they're to blame they simply do not wish to step-up and take responsibility for this. She'd to own created a terrible yelp when it just happened. Plus they tried to protect it up and make me accountable for it. That's why is me the maddest, first they hurt my puppy after which they try to blame me for this. I ought to have requested for my grooming charge back, but used to donot. After I requested to obtain the local supervisor, the shop manager named and stated these were prepared to separate the statement with me and provide me their discount and so I might just owe $50. I told them no. I've not noticed from Petsmart or Banfield since that time. Ideally it's been looked after.

I'd advise anyone who really wants to consider their dog to Petsmart in Ventura to not get it done should you enjoy your pet. Petsmart grooming includes a large start as it pertains for their employees. They have experienced atleast 3-4 supervisors and that I do not identify the groomers you will find various encounters every couple of months. That is got to express anything concerning the workplace. I want I'll never consider her back again to the groomers at Petsmart today she's scared to visit any groomer I've to take action myself. I'd attended Petsmart nearly regular for that previous 24 months now I wont actually proceed inside to purchase your dog bone.


Offender: Petsmart grooming department

Country: USA   State: California   City: Ventura

Category: Animals & Birds

0 comments

Information
Only registered users can leave comments.
Please Register on our website, it will take a few seconds.




Quick Registration via social networks:
Login with FacebookLogin with Google