This is as factual as possible when dealing with Seth Thornsberry as communication and professionalism has been practically non-existant. Seth represented the seller of at least two condos and possibly more in the same complex.
I am speaking onbehalf of the "attempted" buyer who is totally devastated as a result of the substandard treatment. The buyer is a young single mother with a chronically ill child. She was thrilled beyond words to be approved for a "good" loan and the ability to purchase a home for her and her little boy. Her child could finally have a fenced yard to play in and a puppy. The buyer searched every possible property within her price range and finally decided to present an offer through her agent to Seth Thornsberry for one specific condo.
The decision was hard as property in her price range had been in extremely poor condition leaving her to make compromises as to which appliance, feature, etc. Would be least likely to malfunction or need repairs. She and her agent wrote the best possible offer based on her approved loan and she waited patiently watching the clock for Seth Thornsberry to respond on behalf of his client within the specified time.
Well, that time passed and then another day passed. We were told that the buyer was enroute from TX. Then, I believe, he was to tired. Then, Seth didn't come into the office and pickup the offer on his desk to present it in time. Then, the offer was presented, but no response.
I have lost track of the excuses and time that passed but the young mother stayed patient and hopeful. After all of this, all the young mother was told by her agent was that per Seth Thornsberry, the offer was refused but his client would accept it on the condo next door. There was no disclosure as requested, no counter,
no chance to discuss anything. The condo that Seth wanted to switch was out of the question due to poor condition.
To the best of my knowledge, the condo that was bid on was increased the following day following Seth's communication to our agent. Bottom line, it appears that the property was put on the market and after a reasonable offer was made, the owner decided that he wanted to raise the price with no contract or moral obligation through his agent, thus violating the Code of Ethics and acting in bad faith toward their victims, a young mother and an ill 3 yr. Old. I don't believe for a minute that a buyer of means would have been treated this badly so I see extreme discrimination against this mother and child.
This report is true and correct to the best of my knowledge resulting from communication from the young mother's personal agent and personally being present at all meetings, inspections and including personal communications regarding the above property.
0 comments