Usacomplaints.com » 5615949925 » 5615949925 | Page 8

Phone: 5615949925
Found 128 reviews / complaints
Page 8

Magic Jack
Consumer Report

Suddenly the numbers won't go thru and Magic Jack will ask for pre-paid minutes for the local numbers that were free. Magic Jack's agreement with some phone companies didn't work and now many numbers (local area codes) will be charged per call! I had signed (foolishly) for 6 years service and have ...

Magic Jack
Consumer Report

Stated 19.95 year-charged me 190.00 on my debit card day after ordered, they were supposed to wait 30 days. I had ordered two, one with extended time and one just a year. I got one after about a week. Waited a week for the next, never came. Called them they said I didnt. Order it. Then they stopped ...

Magic Jack
Consumer Report

Please wait for a site operator to respond. All operators are currently assisting others. Thanks for your patience. An operator will be with you shortly. All operators are currently assisting others. Thanks for your patience. An operator will be with you shortly. All operators are currently ...

Magic Jack
Consumer Report

MagicJack LP PO Box 6846 West Palm Beach FL 33405 Complaint Description: June 11 - MagicJack Plus Paid $30.00 - MagicJack reported that my phone number port will not be done until June 17th. According to FCC Regulations a Phone company cannot take more than "One Business Day" Magic Jack ...

Magic Jack
Consumer Report

They cancelled my Majicjack account after purchasing the majicjack Plus from them online for $69.99 for 1 year subscription for 1 year with a canadian phone # in April. They cancelled me June 13 and want another $10.99 for another year for a canadian # which was already paid for. I spent over 3 ...


Magic Jack
Consumer Report

I purchased a magicjack in December pre-paid for 5 years and purchased a Canadian phone #. April 19, it stopped working. After spending close to 2hrs online with their 'support', I was told it was because I had not renewed my Canadian phone #. This was something I must have missed in the fine print ...