Dinersclub International are liars, mafia-styled debt collector and are murderers of my father.
These companies and some of their top management and employees are murderers. They murdered my father.
The events below will only be a summary as the case is pending with the municipal court in Prague. Read on.
Upon receipt of a CSA/Diners Club International, Czech s.R.O. (DCI') application form for DCI credit card, which complainant completed and mailed to DCI in late 2000. A card was issued with a CZK 100 000, - credit limit and a possibility of increase to an unlimited after three (3) months of good standing, that is, payment of the amount drawn.
After the expiration of the three months period, complainant requested for an increased to CZK 1 000 000, -which was approved by three (3) executives of DCI Czech, viz., Mgr. Thomas Lill Managing Director Diners Club Czech, s.R.O. And CEO Diners Club CEE Holding AG, Miloslav Boucek, Marketing and Sales Manager and Ing. Eva Krnkov MBA, Managing Director Diners Club Czech, s.R.O. Respectively. This is pursuant to DCI's Boucek testimony during the criminal trial.
DCI and complainant had a great relationship until this complainant was unable to make the balance payment on purchases he made with the card due directly to two events: 1) complainant's partners in the U.S. Had not paid and 2) a failed attempt to recover the amount for the VocalTec gateway purchased by complainants through his DCI from ISC company. VocalTec company Germany authenticated this VocalTec gateway as illegal, according to the police's own investigation yet the prosecutor ignored this damaging report.
DCI was aware of both facts because this complainant advised DCI's Ing. Novotny, Jiri Riha and Miloslav Boucek in writing. Further, complainant negotiated and concluded an agreement about a payment scheme with DCI's agent, Mr. Mares, which complainant could not fulfill at the long run. (see above paragraph.) during this period, DCI's Mr. Riha threatened to report complainant to the foreigners police for his inability to repay the debt, while his colleague, Boucek threatened complainant with the criminal police for the same civil debt obligation. Eventually, DCI did file the criminal complaint. This series of events were only the beginning of a nightmare.
The Procedure
Meanwhile, ISC communications, s.R.O. (ISC') the company that complainant purchased the illegal VocalTec gateway filed a criminal complaint for fraud: non-payment of the balance, which complainant put a stop order on when he realised that ISC did not intend to fulfill their end of the contract. Fortunately, upon explanation and overwhelming evidences, the investigating officers agreed with complainant that it was a civil case and had no bearing whatsoever with criminal jurisdiction. The officers threw out the case.
About six months later, the same crimes investigation department invited complainant again. When complainant arrived, the investigating officers advised him that there were new evidences and they had reopened case.interestingly, the investigating officers' superior later advised complainant that the new evidences in question were a criminal complaint by DCI and an automatic activation of the ISC case.
A trick by the officers; during the interrogation, complainant was informed that the real reason he was there was that his birth number was incorrect. Anyhow, the process had only begun. DCI's Boucek, ISC's slag, Tomkova, messenger, etc all provided false testimonies under oath. The series of straight out lies was uncovered in court a couple of years or so after.
Complainant could not travel due a ban. The police threatened complainant with jail time if he do not tell the truth, of course, the message was clear, accept that you did all that you have been charged with otherwise... Complainant did not know what he was doing at the station and no one has been able to explain it up-till-date.
The Police Resolution and Indictment
within a week of the police resolution, complainant received a notification from the state prosecutor's office for Prague 1 district that she intends to prosecute the charges under the resolution. Complainant began preparing his own defense in hopes that at least he will finally confront his accusers in court and before an unbiased judge.
This hopes were shattered when on the first day of trial complainant heard the judge say the court's interests lies with the amount owed and how complainant intend to repay them. All objections were ignored.in any event, he resolved not to be intimidated, as complainant had researched a lot of the Czech criminal justice system after receipt of the indictment. Complainant wrote his legal and factual objections to the court ruling clearly addressing the various issues at stake, also stating that the courts' ruling would violate his constitutional and due process rights.
As a direct result of his written objections, the playing fields did eventually level between the prosecutor, the accused (complainant) and the victims (DCI and ISC). From this point on, complainant made certain that, none of the witness went unquestioned with documentary evidences to contradict their testimonies. The court then began to see overwhelming facts, which the police and prosecutor totally ignored.
For instance, the police own investigation turned up the fact that the ISC was not a licensed service provider for VocalTec company but ISC indeed compiled and provided the VocalTec gateway pursuant to the relevant Sections of the Czech Commercial Code on work as, though it represented VocalTec. ISC also states in its profile that it represents VocalTec company.
Further, that the supposed evidences (viz. The application form and a forged eBanka account statement which was supposedly sent by facsimile) and provided by the key witnesses (Boucek and ISC's employees) were very contradictory in all respect.
In addition, the court found that these companies made a series of grave business mistakes from the outset and were attempting to cover their mistakes by making complainant the scapegoat. Boucek did accept the series of mistakes that DCI made stating that the rules are different now (revised) because DCI was using its parent company rules, which were inapplicable in the Czech republic. It was also apparent from Slegr's and Puzik's testimonies that one or both of them had to committed perjury.
DCI's Boucek further stated in court that DCI investigated complainant's eBanka, account balance and compared it with the account statement, which Boucek alleges that complainant sent to him via facsimile but complainant account movements were unrealistic? How can banks violate the personal data protection act in this way? Who is liable for such impermissible infringements?
The Decision
Largely, the court could only but sit and go through this unbelievable chain of conjured up events that lead to complainant prosecution. It is obvious from the court's decision that it was a business related civil matter which the state police and prosecutor brought with gross incompetence lacking due investigation. Additionally, the witnesses' testimonies simply did not match the falsified material evidences. Finally, the police and prosecutor's offices completely ignored most of the vital of these evidences.
Complainant dare pose this question: who will guard the guards' (quis custodiet ipsos custodes) and prevent a recurrence of these events when the state instrumentalities are usurped by the above companies to further their private goals?
Complainant was fortunate that the court saw through the shred of the companies, their employees, the police and the prosecutor's offices. Many are not so fortunate and incarcerated by the combination of events mentioned above. The court decided that not only was there no evidence of wrongdoing by the complainant in the trial but that also, there was no evidence of any implied wrongdoing pursuant the relevant provisions of the Czech penal code. This is quite unusual to include the last sentence of no implied wrong-doing' because it leaves absolutely no room for error in fact.in addition, complainant praises the court's wisdom and insights.
Devastating Epilog:
Companies such as those noted above have long had and ate their cakes because they experience no hindrances and/or oppositions in the form of civil litigation and exposure as complainant have done here. The company's continuous abuses must stop. The next front would be to get the Czech legislature to pass a law out-lawing the use of certain techniques in debt collection. A civil litigation against DCI, eBanka, ISC, and their employees for serious infringements, which has and continues to cause grave damage to complainant's business, family and himself, is under way.
In addition, complainant does not count-out the possibility of filing a claim against the state for the role, which the police and prosecutor played after the criminal complaint, investigating and prosecuting the above matter.
Additionally, complainant referred the above grave infringements to the president unit for a review because DCI Czech is a franchise of DCI north America. Nancy B. Hand (of the presidential unit, diners club north America located at 8430 w Bryn Mawr Ave, Chicago, Il 60631-3473,) as is expected referred complainant back to the DCI's Czech franchise. The president's unit is towing the company line. Further, Ms. Hand's advised complainant that their franchise has been unsuccessful trying to reach complainant. Ms. Hand referred complainant back to contact the DCI Czech franchise.
Pleased that both complainant's parents were alive, it brings a secondary question, namely whether the travel ban is worst as opposed to lack of funds to bring both ill parents for badly needed medial treatment or for a trip to bury his parents or to attend their funeral should the unexpected happen? Well, at least the answer to the immediate question is now obvious because these defendants have murdered complainant's father, Chief Edward Mfam Asu, Sr. Who passed away at 12:30 local time on February 26th as a direct result of their intentional frivolous, causeless and meritless complaint that prevented complainant bringing his father for badly needed medical treatment. Not only did the defendants prohibit complainant's movement by the travel ban which prevented complainant from making business trips to collect the debts owed, the defendants' complaint caused him not to visit complainant's very sick parents, and bring them for to Czech for badly needed specialised medical care which eventually took my father's live. What is the price tag on this dastardly act?
Personally, complainant holds the above companies directly liable for his father's death. Moreover, in the weeks that follow, a detail account of the origin through the court process including the events, names of the companies and actors that lead to his beloved father's death shall be narrated.
These companies must not get away with such violations. Companies such as these must have no place to hide or run from their responsibilities following a grossly infringements of the clients' rights: in accordance wit the adage that when the wind blows the genitalia of the hen is exposed. There is a need to stop these companies' at all legitimate means especially by publishing violations.
Ed
Prague 9
Czech Republic
0 comments